My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
March 2006
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes and Recordings
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2006
>
March 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:17 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:12:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001361
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
B. LANDMARKS (There were none heard.) <br />C. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATIONS (There were none heard.) <br />III. REGULAR BUSINESS <br />A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />1. January 23, 2006 <br />Catherine Hostetler: I would like to make the suggestion that on page 26 that we amend it to clarify, <br />basically. There is some ambiguity with the minutes about what was in the Preservation Plan vis-a- <br />vis the standards for landmarks, and I would like to clarify that in addition to my comments recorded <br />in the proposed minutes that I found the C of A application for 2300 Portage independently violates <br />both the B standards and the historic preservation plan standards for demolition of a landmark. <br />And I know that other people were using the same language that I was using, Mary Jane used it, Lynn <br />and also Tim used it, and also with your comments if you would like you to incorporate this as well <br />so there won't be any problems or any question as to which standards we were referring to. <br />Timothy Klusczinski noted another correction was needed on page 28 under approval of minutes for <br />November 21, 2005. The vote should be corrected to 6-0-1 as Tim abstained from the motion to <br />approve those minutes. <br />Mary Jane Chase: Then, I move that we accept the changes from Catherine and myself, from Lynn <br />and Tim. Todd Zeiger seconded the motion and it was unanimously approved. <br />B. TREASURER'S REPORT <br />Timothy Klusczinski formally submitted the treasurer's report (the budget location for the <br />department) to the Commission. <br />C. COMMITTEE REPORTS <br />1. President's Report <br />Lynn Patrick reported that the Commission had a well -attended retreat. There was much discussion <br />on the Commission's goals for the future though the specific implementation of the goals will need <br />further discussion. Lynn also noted that there was a meeting with neighbors from Edgewater Place <br />about 513 River Avenue's fence issue. At the meeting the prior decisions of the Commission were <br />reviewed and its decision to take no action was again emphasized. <br />2. Landmark Committee Report <br />Todd Zeiger reported that he and Catherine had met with the Planning Department and the South <br />Gateway Association on the Burke Building, 1019 S. Michigan. As a point of information, <br />Community Development/South Gateway may come to the Commission with an application, possibly <br />to demolish the building. <br />D. STAFF REPORTS <br />1. C of A Approvals; Correspondence <br />Catherine Hostetler reported that the staff had approved a C of A for 129 West North Shore, which <br />was included in the packets. Catherine noted that the office had received several pieces of <br />correspondence including: a note from Glory -June Grief that the National Register nomination for the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.