My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
September 2003
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes and Recordings
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2003
>
September 2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:16 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:11:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001360
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
structurally retained with only some loss of property. It could affect one structure that rates an <br />Outstanding/13, the D. F. Bailey bank barn that Andrew Toth designed in 1940. Two landmarks are <br />within a mile of the proposed route: the Emil Johnson Farmhouse at 60717 Locust Road and the James <br />Vandenbosch Farm at 61955 Locust Road. <br />Because Alternative C does not shift US 31 too far from its current path, this possible road right of way <br />may provide the city with an opportunity to enhance the southern entrance of the city even though much <br />traffic will be shifted from US 31 and the current South Michigan Street entrance. The city could <br />possibly end up with a more attractive entrance and enhanced commercial and retail operations <br />approaching downtown as well as the creation of a more vibrant, high-density urban environment than <br />exists at this time. On the other hand, diverting traffic from US 31 and South Michigan could cause <br />traffic and potential visitors to by pass the city and its businesses. This placement would also end any <br />chance for the reuse of the railroad right of way and the retention of the corridor's presence in the county <br />landscape as a marker of an historic period. Because of the close proximity to the current roadbed, <br />alternative C may have fewer drawbacks than option G. Because this option will move the <br />alignment of the road more drastically than E and F and will remove the entirety of the railroad <br />bed, staff finds C less favorable. <br />Alternative E <br />Curving into US 31 between Roosevelt and Kern Roads, Alternative E will affect those structures along <br />the proposed route that overlaps with option C as well as a barn dating to 1885 that rates Significant/11, <br />two significant arts and crafts bungalows, a contributing Queen Anne residence, and the Julia Schafer <br />farmhouse that ranks Significant/12. Option E may directly affect two local historic landmarks: the <br />Joseph Fameman Italianate farmhouse on US 31 and Southlawn Cemetery. The cemetery dates to 1850 <br />and has a small administration building dating to the 1920s. Option E will affect a large portion of the <br />Penn Central/Conrail RR corridor as well as several other significant historic structures along US 31 s <br />current path. <br />Because Alternative E moves the alignment of the roadway into the rural landscape, staff finds that <br />this option is not as favorable as F. To its benefit, Route E would not harm historic structures that <br />line US 31 south of Roosevelt Road. It would reconnect the new highway to the existing roadbed <br />and entrance into South Bend. <br />Alternative F <br />Of all the proposed routes, Alternative F remains on the current US 31 path for the longest distance. <br />North of the city of Lakeville, F curves to the east to rejoin the existing US 31 at New Road. The <br />proposed route ends at the US 31 junction with US 20. Due to the large amount of residential and <br />commercial development along US 31, alternative F offers many challenges. Nine historic structures, <br />including two local landmarks, and possibly more stand along the roadside. If the roadway is widened, <br />many of these homes and businesses, historic or not, may have to be moved or demolished. Yet, it may <br />be preferable to reuse an existing travel artery rather than cut through rural and suburban areas with new <br />roadbeds. The negative impact on the specific structures along the roadway, though great, may be <br />comparably less than the possible negative affects upon the county's landscape and living environments <br />caused by the construction of one of the other options. <br />Of the many structures that would be directly affected by possible improvements and widening of US 31 <br />as proposed in Alternative F, the following are historic and recorded on the Historic Structures Inventory <br />of St. Joseph County completed by the Historic Preservation Commission and Crumlish & Sporleder in <br />1975. As a person drives north in Union County, he or she may gather a brief glimpse of a 1924 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.