My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
May 1992
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes and Recordings
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 1992
>
May 1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:25 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:07:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001404
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' <br />Commission members from the obligation to take a stand <br />on the issue. Under any circumstances /tabling, <br />' <br />withdrawal, voting -down), the petition could be <br />reintroduced in the future, <br />Mr.Qakley said he'd prefer a vote. A'definite vote <br />would clarify the HPC^m stand on this issue. He <br />` <br />endorsed Mr. Holycroas`s report, <br />4 woman said vote should be taken because it would <br />` prove to the School Board that the landmark issue was <br />closed. <br />Mr. Eide said he maw no reason to perpetuate the <br />issue; the golf course would never meet landmark <br />criteria. He moved to recommend against landmmrking <br />the golf course. Mrs. Petraas seconded the motion.. <br />Mrs. 'porleder said she would prefer a oositive <br />motion. Mr. Eide -acoordinglY withdrew his motion' <br />Mrs. Sporleder moved to recommend landmark status for <br />the golf course. Mr' YVelsheimar seconded the motion. <br />Mr. Dxian then made a statement. First, he said be <br />. thought it a mistake to say the golf course should not <br />be saved. Second, he said he couldn't understand the <br />need to choose between the golf course and the high <br />school --neither should be destroyed. A school's <br />quality had nothing to do with the number of acres it <br />occupied; other factors made aa school good -or bad. <br />The decision to demolish a high school simply because <br />it stood on less than ZO acres baffled him: perhaps <br />the School Board wished to move all the schools from <br />the City to the County area. <br />Mrs. Sporleder then questioned 1-2 statements in the <br />staff report. She said she considered the location of <br />the golf course --completely surrounded by the <br />city --unusual. Mrs. Choitz^pointed out that, <br />originally, the golf course lay in an outlying rural <br />area; development had come later. Mrs. Sporledar said <br />that, nevertheless, it was unusual to have a green <br />space in the center of a city. <br />Mr.Oakley remarked that, even if Riley High <br />School - <br />annexed part of the golf course, 65% of it would <br />remain. According to option #5, (a set of plans <br />submitted by Dr. Sriver that kept Riley at Ewing), the <br />school's east end would be extended by no more than <br />80,000 feet. This would not run all the way across <br />the golf course. Moreover, the trees to be removed <br />were not remarkably old. <br />Mr. Haas said South Send was lucky to have a 9 -hole <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.