My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-27-12 Council Agenda & Packet
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Common Council Agenda Packets
>
2012
>
02-27-12 Council Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2012 11:27:45 AM
Creation date
2/23/2012 11:23:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Area Board of Zoning Appeals—February 1, 2012 <br /> MR. BULOT: I'm sorry I was listening... <br /> MR. HAWLEY: Is that alley paved behind the subject property that runs between...? <br /> MR. URBANSKI: That's what you were asking wasn't it, not the parking lot? <br /> MR. CRUMLISH: Yeah, <br /> MS. O'NEAL: It's unpaved. The whole alley through the back of the building onto the next lots are <br /> unpaved. There's no concrete if that's what you're saying. <br /> MR, PHIPPS: In your petition you mentioned the required 84 parking spaces, I'm assumed that's what the <br /> zoning ordinance requires for a bar or restaurant or nightclub of this size. You now said you're up to 27, <br /> what information can you give us that would not indicate that 27 is really adequate for this size facility? <br /> MR. HUNTINGTON: Well that's why we're asking for in part for the Special Exception, the variance, Mr. <br /> Phipps. This essentially is a new venture and we have no real concept of how expansive it will become. In <br /> all likelihood the 27 spaces overall plus whatever available street parking that is there will be sufficient. It's <br /> all public parking on the streets throughout the whole area. But there's not the, I can't really tell you why the <br /> 84 is there. This number 1 believe came from the Building Department. Was given that number from... <br /> MR. PHIPPS: But from your plans for whatever you're going to do with the building, how marry people can <br /> be or hold or is there some relationship between the number of patrons you might have there at one time that <br /> the 27 parking spaces... <br /> MS. O'NEAL: I think because when I first talked to Mark at the Building Department, since there was only <br /> two parking spaces that's why they came up with that big number but since the surveyor came out and did <br /> the plan for us and it said now we have five spaces that cut it down to some many that we needed. <br /> MR. PHIPPS: Well five is better than two and twenty seven is even better but that's still a long ways short <br /> from the eighty four so I'm trying to get some relationship between the two numbers. <br /> MR. LYONS: Eight four is the number based on the occupancy load from the fire marshal. You they're <br /> number of occupants that could maximally occupy the building, run it through the parking calculations and <br /> the zoning ordinance requires and that's how you get the 84 spaces. <br /> MR. PHIPPS: And that's based on an assumption of 160 could be in that...? <br /> MR. LYONS: I could do the math the other way. <br /> MR. URBANSKI: How many people will the establishment hold? Tables, chairs, bar <br /> stools...approximately? I'm not saying exactly. <br /> 52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.