My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-03-06 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
02-03-06 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2007 1:28:48 PM
Creation date
12/11/2007 4:34:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Date
2/3/2006
Document Relationships
02-03-06 Agenda
(Superseded by)
Path:
\Public\Redevelopment Commission\Agendas & Packets\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting -February 3, 2006 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />B. South Bend Central Development Area <br />(} continued... <br />Ms. Laurent noted that there is significant <br />interest on the part of the pubic related to <br />the direction that will be taken with this <br />riverfront property from a land use and <br />design perspective. The complexity of the <br />myriad issues brought into distinction with <br />these proposals need to be addressed <br />carefully and should take into account <br />public input. <br />Ms. Laurent noted that staff must still do <br />its due diligence in verifying the financial <br />ability of each developer to complete the <br />project. She asked the Commission what it <br />would like staff to do next. <br />Mr. King noted that his reading of both <br />proposals had generated a long list of <br />questions about each of them. He would <br />like both developers to attend the <br />February 17 or March 3 meeting of the <br />Commission to answer his and any other <br />questions about their proposals. <br />In order to compile a comprehensive list of <br />questions for that meeting, Ms. Laurent <br />will provide the Commissioners with her <br />list of questions. They will add to that list <br />any additional questions they have. The <br />list will then be submitted to the developers <br />so they will be prepared with answers. <br />Ms. Greene noted that both bids received <br />by the Commission were non-conforming <br />in that they did not meet the bid <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.