10-09-06 Informal Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

October 9, 2006 Zoning and Annexation Committee Meeting Minutes Page 2 There was no one from the public to speak in favor or in opposition to the Bill. Council Member Dieter noted that he was the District Council Member and that the prior concerns have been properly addressed. He then made a motion, seconded by Council Member Kirsits that Bill No. 06-102 be recommended favorably to Council. The motion passed. Bill No. 06-103 S ecial Exce Lion for 505 East Ireland: Council Member Kuspa called for a report from the Board of Zoning Appeals. Charles Bulot, Assistant Zoning Administrator, noted that the petition for special exception of ROI Investments was to allow retail sales in an "O" Office District. It had a public hearing before the Board of Zoning Appeals an September 21, 2006 and received a favorable recommendation. Tyler Glenn noted that he has offices at 910 East Ireland Road and is the petition. He occupies 113 of the building as his office and is seeking a special exception to allow retail such as a boutique jewelry store. No one from the public spoke in favor or in opposition to the Bill. Dr. Varner, the District Council Member for the area, noted that the look of the building blends into the neighborhood and that they are supportive of it. Bill Schalliol of the Department of Community and Economic Development spoke in favor of the request. Council Member Dieter made a motion, seconded by Citizen Member Talley that Bill No. 06-103 be recommended favorably to Council. The motion passed. Bill No. 06-105 Pro osed Fiscal Plan for the Brick Road Annexation Area Bill No. 51-06 Annexation Ordinance for the Brick Road Annexation Area: Council Member Kuspa then called for presentations on Bill Nos. 06-105 and 51-06. Marco Mariani of the Department of Community and Economic made the formal presentation on Bill No. 06-105. The area contains .37 acres of agricultural [and which is at least 12.5% contiguous to the current city limits. He highlighted portions of the Fiscal Plan (copy attached). It was noted that under Section IV. Addressing "Land 1Jse Analysis & Development Criteria" that in the 2na paragraph it should be corrected to ".37„