My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-27-06 Council Meeting Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Common Council Meeting Minutes
>
2006
>
02-27-06 Council Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2008 1:19:34 PM
Creation date
12/7/2007 4:31:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Counci - Date
2/27/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 2006 <br />COMMENTS FROM MR. STEVE FRANCIS REGARDING TAX ABATEMENTS <br />Mr. Steve Francis, (no address given), stated that he running for the office of 2nd District <br />Representative. Mr. Francis commended South Bend’s Tax Abatement Policies. He <br />believes that they are the best in the state. <br />COMMENTS REGARDING THE DISORDERLY HOUSE ORDINANCE <br />Ms. Lizzi Shappell, 416 Badin Hall, Notre Dame, Indiana, spoke in response to the <br />ongoing campus debate on community relations. The Student Senate would like to <br />respond and seek the Council assistance. The unfortunate stigma of an “elitist” attitude <br />within the Notre Dame student body towards the community of South Bend has lasted too <br />long, and it has been extremely detrimental to the interactions between the students and <br />the City of South Bend. The amended Disorderly House Ordinance unfairly targets <br />students with extreme measures for a first offense, a position that the Student Senate will <br />continue to assert. Despite student sentiment, it remains a law by which we as members <br />of the South Bend Community must abide. Through continued dialogue and an open <br />mind, Notre Dame students have the ability to enact change and eventually resolve what <br />has proven to b e cyclical problem. It is imperative that we as students accept our <br />responsibility to be instruments of change and begin the process of improving the <br />relationship between Notre Dame students and South Bend. The process will take time, <br />energy and commitment, but in order to insure that the unfortunate situations of some of a <br />few fellow students do not continue, we as students need to take the first step towards <br />change. It can be as simple as a friendly hello to a member of the South Bend <br />Community, to introducing oneself to a new neighbor, to investigating the community <br />and all it offers beyond Grape Road. The Student Senate calls to action every member of <br />the Notre Dame family to embrace an attitude of mutual respect of the South Bend <br />Community. Through a Committee on Community Relations, we can help students foster <br />a better understanding and improved relationship with the South Bend Community. The <br />Senate and the Committee remain dedicated to the needs of Notre Dame’s student body <br />and are always open to questions or further ideas. <br />Mr. Sean Finaly, Sorin Hall, Notre Dame, Indiana, stated that the Student Body of the <br />University of Notre Dame is working toward a partnership with the community. Through <br />continued dialogue and an open mind, Notre Dame students have the ability to enact <br />change and eventually resolve what has proven to be a cyclical problem. It is imperative <br />that students accept responsibility to be instruments of change and begin the process of <br />improving the relationship between Notre Dame Students and South Bend. <br />Mr. Nick Kuszma, 111 St. Peter, South Bend, Indiana, stated that the Disorderly House <br />Ordinance and the Notice to Abate works. The amended Public Nuisance Ordinance <br />directs the City to notify the owner and occupants of a property if prohibited conduct has <br />occurred on the premise through a “Notice to Abate” letter after one violation of §13-75.5 <br />rather than three violations; and the letter, addressed to the occupants of the property, <br />reads, “The public nuisance must be abated immediately. The owner and all occupants <br />will be held responsible for any violation of §13-75.5 which occurs after this Notice to <br />Abate” There are several Notre Dame students that are currently facing eviction after a <br />first offense; and due to legal fees, time costs, and a weakened ability to secure future <br />housing, eviction as a punishment for a first offence is more harsh from the perspective of <br />the student than the fine of no more than $2,500, as prescribed by the ordinance after the <br />second offense. The Public Nuisance Ordinance should be further amended to be <br />consistent with its original intent; that “Eviction Proceedings as a defense: for owners be <br />encouraged after it is apparent that the initial “Notice to Abate” letter has not resulted in <br />changed behavior by tenants; and that charges against the landlord be dropped by <br />initiating procedures of eviction after notice of the second violation. <br />James , 424 N. Frances, Apt. 12, South Bend, Indiana, stated that the Student Senate of <br />the University of Notre Dame remains as committed as ever to the goal of improved <br />community relations, but that the Disorderly House Ordinance as passed threatens this <br />goal by calling for a targeted and extreme punishment of students. <br />20 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.