Laserfiche WebLink
place to have a particular line-item for this as well as working with AEP to improve their <br /> lighting. <br /> Aaron Perri, Executive Director of Venues Parks & Arts with offices at 321 E. Walter Street, <br /> replied, I can't rattle off the top of my head the names, specifically, of the folks that are <br /> reimbursed but I would be glad to provide those. I think there were seven (7). The job <br /> requirements of many people in our office have them moving geographically throughout the City <br /> as we have spaces throughout. This is an alternative to providing a City-owned vehicle as well as <br /> an alternative to providing mileage. This is a cost-saving measure. <br /> Councilmember Oliver Davis arrived at the meeting at 5:11 p.m. <br /> Jen Hockenhull, City Controller with offices on the 12th floor of the County-City Building, <br /> replied, We can provide the names of the individuals in the Mayor's Office. The main reason for <br /> the auto allowance is so that when folks are moving around on City-business,they don't have to <br /> keep track of their mileage. At the end of the day it is effectively a cost-saving measure. <br /> Eric Horvath, Director of Public Works with offices on the 13th floor of the County-City <br /> Building, replied, To be clear, there are a number of different ways to fund lights. One (1) of the <br /> ways is through projects as it would be project-specific. You'll see the new lights on the Jasinski <br /> over-pass, on Olive and Sample, Downtown South Bend, and so on. Typically every year we ask <br /> for$200,000 for a program called Light Up South Bend. That comes out of Fund#404 which is <br /> our COIT Fund. We again asked for another$200,000 this year like we have for the past number <br /> of years. We work with AEP to do about seventy (70) lights every year in different districts. <br /> They do two (2) Council districts a year and typically put thirty (30)to forty (40) new lights in <br /> each district. We will continue that program but in addition to that we also have a lamppost <br /> program. That is a cost-share program and we offer bids every year based on applications we <br /> receive. This puts a light in the front yard and helps with public lighting. The bids this year,per <br /> lamppost, were eight hundred dollars ($800). That is a pretty typical cost. The resident pays two <br /> hundred and fifty ($250) dollars and the balance is paid by the City. We are also looking at a <br /> pilot program that may look at a different cost-share on that but those are two (2) programs <br /> offered. Beyond that,we also utilize those funds as we transition a number of lights. About <br /> eighty percent(80%) of the lights in the City are AEP-owned and twenty percent(20%) are City- <br /> owned. We are in the process of transitioning the City-owned lights to LEDs. <br /> He continued, We do have a 211 Driver that we recently asked to start. That is a person who is <br /> on at night that receives certain calls if we have an accident, say, if traffic signals go down. They <br /> are tasked with immediately putting up stop signs. When they are not responding to those calls, <br /> they are looking for lights that are out to make sure we get that information to the right people. <br /> Looking long-term, we will continue working with AEP for LEDs. <br /> Bill Dunn, 1620 Southwood Avenue, stated, I have two (2) questions regarding street repaving. I <br /> have recently heard the phrase smooth streets. Are we only selecting specific portions of a lane <br /> as opposed to the whole lane? I've been told there are about 2,200 lane-miles in the City limits <br /> and my quick math tells me that every street in town can count on being re-paved once <br /> 2 <br />