My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-27-10 Common Council Meeting Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Common Council Meeting Minutes
>
2010
>
09-27-10 Common Council Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2011 12:33:11 PM
Creation date
10/29/2010 2:50:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, 2010 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />But if you are looking for a long-term sustainable 20 year service life you will have to <br />build up the structural strength of the road and widen it a little bit so that there is more <br />comfort and safety for the large trucks passing a vehicle. It’s a narrow road currently and <br />would like to get it to two 12 foot standard lanes. The water is necessary to bring up to <br />adequate pressure for fire protection and for other uses from Ireland Road north to the <br />site. It would then enhance the development potential of the acreage that it goes past. <br />Both of those projects, the water main is $250,000 dollars; the road is not to exceed <br />$500,000 dollars; which is a base widening with a 3 to 4 inch overlay polymer modified <br />asphalt and would be using the existing 8 inch asphalt depth on Gertrude and Linden as a <br />good base foundation. Mr. Gilot stated that there aren’t too may arterial streets in South <br />Bend that have much more than 11 or 12 inches of thickness for structural strength for a <br />lot of heavy trucks. So why we think that the 8 inch could take some truck traffic <br />building it up to 11 or 12 inches would make it a very durable pavement for the long <br />term. He stated that the petitioner stated that it would take four months to order <br />equipment and two and half months to install it. Mr. Gilot stated that they can do the <br />road and the water main in much less time. 2600 foot of water main could be done in 26 <br />days or less and the paving, the widening is going to take a few days and the overlay can <br />be done in a day, it’s a matter of getting Spring temperatures that are adequate. We will <br />need to appropriate the 50% that comes from the water utility and the road funding <br />source and well as getting the petitioner’s money as matched to do the project in the <br />Spring. <br /> <br />Councilmember Oliver Davis stated that this would not help with improvements on <br />Chippewa Avenue. <br /> <br />Mr. Gilot responded that if there is an improved widened Linden Avenue, he did not <br />know why anyone would want to use Chippewa. <br /> <br />Councilmember Oliver Davis then questioned where the money is coming from to <br />improve Linden Avenue and during the budget hearings it was mentioned that funds are <br />needed to repair streets in the city, so how can the city put up half of the funds for this <br />project and what happens to the other streets that need repair? <br /> <br />Mr. Gilot stated that he understands that this is a $6 million dollar investment into the <br />city which would produce $90,000 a year in new property tax revenue. He stated that is <br />about a 4 year payback and a very good return on the investment. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kirsits advised that he takes comfort in the 15 commitments Schlipp has <br />pledge to keep. Should he violate any of them, neighbors will have grounds to sue him, <br />and city code enforcement or the county health department can shut it down. <br />Councilmember Kirsits stated that there is probably no way we can bring everyone <br />together. The best we can do is put the commitments in place and have a hammer and if <br />this turns out to be a problem, then we have the tool to correct it. He stated that he did <br />not think it would be necessary and thinks that this will be a state-of-the-art operation.” <br /> <br />Council President Dieter thanked everyone involved and to look at the total package. He <br />thanked them for the on-site tour and thanked Public Works Director, Gary Gilot for his <br />assistance. <br /> <br />There being no one else present wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or in <br />opposition to this Resolution, Councilmember Oliver Davis made a motion to defeat this <br />Resolution. Councilmember David Varner seconded the motion. The Resolution was <br />defeated by a roll call vote of three (3) ayes (Councilmember’s Varner, Oliver Davis, <br />Rouse) and six (6) nays. Additionally, Councilmember Kirsits made a motion to adopt <br />th <br />the 4 Substitute Bill 10-40. Councilmember LaFountain seconded the motion. The <br />Resolution was adopted by a roll call vote of six (6) ayes and three (3) nays <br />(Councilmember’s Varner, Oliver Davis, Rouse.) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 32 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.