My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Industrial Discharge Permit - St. Joseph Energy Center
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Board of Works Documents
>
2017
>
Licenses and Permits
>
Industrial Discharge Permit - St. Joseph Energy Center
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2025 3:18:24 PM
Creation date
5/24/2017 1:44:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Permit Applications
Document Date
5/23/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ii. the duration of the bypass, including exact dates and times, and if the bypass has not been <br />corrected, how long the bypass is expected to continue; and <br />iii, steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the bypass. <br />4. Duty to Mitigate <br />a. The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize any adverse impact to the POTW <br />resulting from noncompliance with any effluent limitations specified in this permit, including <br />such accelerated or additional monitoring necessary to determine the nature and impact of the <br />non -compliant discharge. <br />5. Upset Provision <br />a. Upset means an exceptional incident in which there is unintended and temporary noncompliance <br />with categorical Pretreatment Standards because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the <br />permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, <br />improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventative <br />maintenance, or careless or improper operation. <br />b. An upset shall constitute an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with <br />categorical Pretreatment Standards if the requirements below are met. <br />c. A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through <br />properly signed contemporaneous operating log, or other relevant evidence that: <br />i. an upset occurred and the permittee can identify the cause(s) of the upset <br />ii. the facility was at the time being operated in a prudent workman -like manner and in <br />compliance with applicable operation and maintenance procedures; and <br />iii. the permittee has submitted the following information to the Director within twenty-four (24) <br />hours of becoming aware of the upset (if this information is provided orally, a written <br />submission must be submitted within five (5) days): <br />a. a description of the discharge and cause of noncompliance; <br />b. the period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times, or, if not corrected, the anticipated <br />time the noncompliance is expected to continue; and <br />c. the steps being taken and/or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the <br />noncompliance. <br />d. In any enforcement proceeding, the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset shall <br />have the burden of proof. <br />e. The permittee shall have the opportunity for a judicial determination on any claim of upset only <br />in an enforcement action brought for noncompliance with categorical Pretreatment Standards. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.