Laserfiche WebLink
Joe Sag ars <br />From: Joe Saggars <br />Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 10:05 AM <br />To; Joe Saggars <br />Subject: RE: Change order request for permanent power <br />Jacob, <br />Please see r•espames below in red and C APITAL IZED text, <br />Thanks, <br />00 <br />HRP Construction <br />From: Jacob Klosinski (mailto:iklosinsta southbendin.aov7 <br />Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 8:34 AM <br />To: Joe Saggars <br />Cc: Anthony Kenning (akenninga dlz.com) <br />Subject: RE: Change order request for permanent power <br />Joe: <br />Please ask Michiana Contracting, Inc. to provide the breakdown of Material, Labor, Rental Costs, and catalog <br />out sheets for the proposed items listed in the proposal. SEE ATTACHED. <br />Has AEP explained the need for two (2) four inch conduits? Are both being used or are they proposing one to <br />be provided as a spare? The City does not need to install a spare if the conduit is not being utilized for the <br />power feed by AEP for the Lift Station. ONE IS INDEED A SPARE, BUT AEP IS REQUIRING IT. SEE <br />ATTACHED. <br />What is the credit associated with the 1-1/4" Conduit Raceway material that is not being run in lieu of the 4" <br />conduits for the power feed (Refer to Sheets E0.1, E1.0, E2.0)? This is not described in the change order <br />proposal. THIS WAS OMITTED FROM THE FIRST PRICING BREAKDOWN, PLEASE SEE ATTACHED <br />CREDIT. <br />Why does this equipment require a separate H-Frame? Why can't tie equipment be mounted to the proposed <br />utility pole using U-bolts, Uni-strut and a Back Plate? This would be much more cost effective for the <br />City. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DLZ RESPONSE TO RR #10 REQUIRING WHAT HAS BEEN <br />SUBMTTED. THE COMBINATION OF ITEMS TO BE MOUNTED TO THE POLE WOULD BE TOO WIDE TO <br />ONLY HAVE ONE VERTICAL UPRIGHT. ALSO, THAT WOULD NOT MEET AEFS REQUIREMENTS OF <br />TWO VERTICAL UPRIGHTS. <br />Regards, <br />Jacob <br />