05-08-17 Utilities - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Environmental Protection Agency. That Consent Decree laid out a series of steps that the City was compelled to take in order to bring it closer to compliance. That work was already underway by the time my Administration came in and our Administration continued that plan. As you will see in the presentation(which is available in the City Clerk's Office), Phase One (1) included a total of$149 million in investments. The net effect of Phase One (1) has significantly reduced the number of occasions when untreated water enters the river. We also established an office to deal with this Long Term Control Plan Implementation. The longer we did the work, the more it became clear that there were going to be major issues in completing the plan as it was originally laid out. On one (1) hand, the City was required to implement this plan by federal law. On the other hand, the more it was looked at, the more expensive it became. The only way we could pay for this to work was through sewer rates. That means residential, commercial and industrial rate- payers would pick up the tab. There is no funding from the Federal Government for the Federal mandate. So we knew further analysis was required and you will be hearing more about that in detail. One (1)helpful thing was that because South Bend was an early adopter in Smart Sewers, the City was uniquely able to do analysis using real-time data that was gathered from the system. We may have inherited the expensive long-term control plan, but we also inherited some of the best sewer technology in the world which allowed us to use real-time data to see how good the plan was. There are also a number of passionate and committed individuals that came together to make this plan happen and that will be exemplified throughout this presentation. I want to thank and acknowledge those folks. I would also like to thank the Council, as well as the private partners that have all come together to make this plan work. Mayor Buttigieg continued, So the analysis which you are about to see has good news and bad news. The bad news is it was even more expensive than we feared. The ballpark number that was talked about when we took office was around $500 million. The original version of the Long Term Control Plan according to the analysis would be $713 million more than the $149 million that has already gone in. So that comes to $861 million if there are no charges. The even worse news is that it probably wouldn't achieve the goals that were required of us, knowing what we now know. The plan that was agreed upon did, however, represent the best good-faith efforts of the administration at the time,knowing what they knew then. But several things have changed, including our ability to analyze what this plan would actually look like, not to mention the technologies and the alternatives that exist. The bottom line is that the analysis shows the plan's unaffordability,to which many in the community are expressing fear. The analysis suggested that some families could be paying up to ten percent (10%) of their income just for this project. So the good news is the analysis has pointed the way toward a better alternative. We believe there is a way to do this for about$200 million. That's about half a billion dollars less than the price tag that was initially set for the original plan. However,that still only exists on paper. In other words, as of today we are still required as a matter of federal law to pursue the older,more expensive, inferior plan. So in order to change that, we are going to need permission. We are going to have to go to the table and meet with the Department of Justice,the Environmental Protection Agency and the State to ask them to allow us to pursue this better way. Part of that will be showing the environmental benefits because this includes green-infrastructure solutions. Part of this is also showing that the community is united and is rallying around the sense of urgency in finding a better and more affordable way. We are continuing to engage policymakers on the bigger picture. There are three (3)tracks going on here. The first is the technical track. That includes finding out what it is going to take, what it is going to cost and whether there is a 2