11-28-16 Public Works and Property Vacation

Home Browse Search

Mr. Masters responded, We haven't heard anything more about that from the City Engineer, but if the City requires that, I'm sure the petitioner would be fine with it. There should be no trouble to get an easement, because he owns both properties, excuse me [unintelligible] both properties. Roger Nawrot, speaking on behalf of Public Works, stated, The engineer at the time, back on the 23`d of August, 2016, requested it. It would probably be a ten (10) foot strip along that east edge of the alley, so that if somebody happened to make the turn late, they would still be able to make it. Committeemember Broden asked, And that would be up to the petitioner, because it was either in the north or the south, right? Mr. Nawrot walked over to Committeemember Broden and showed her a map of the property, stating, It would be right there on the east end with somebody coming to the west. Mr. Masters asked if Mr. Nawrot would show him the same thing so that he could mark it for future reference on his own copy of the map, which Mr. Nawrot did. Committeemember Voorde asked Council Attorney Cekanski - Farrand if he needed to change the typical verbiage of his motion for a favorable recommendation to Council, and she responded, As long as Mr. Masters would just verbally state that your client has the opportunity to address the easement, that would be subject to that. Mr. Masters stated, Yes, so, we will speak more about it this evening. I expect our client will be there, but yes, I don't see any problem with that, and if that's what the City requires, then that's what we are doing. Committeemember John Voorde made a motion to send Substitute Bill No. 68 -16 to the Common Council with a favorable recommendation and Committeemember Randy Kelly seconded the motion, which carried by a voice vote of three (3) ayes. With no further items on the agenda, Committee Chair Jo Broden adjourned the meeting at 3:44 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, . gbe-e� J roden, Committee Chair