Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING October 26, 2015 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />paint, PCB, asbestos, ground water testing, and all soil samples have been completed, so now it is <br />just working with the state. <br /> <br />Councilmember Valarie Schey- Have we received federal grants for all that work? <br /> <br />th <br />Brock Zeeb of Community Investment Office on the 14 Floor - No. Redevelopment approved an <br />environmental indemnity agreement where most of that work has been covered under and <br />remediation of the site. <br /> <br />Michael Danch, 1643 Commerce Dr. - What we are asking for is to rezone this from Light <br />Industrial to the PUD District. What they are trying to do is renovate this entire structure all <br />750,000 sq. ft. plus add some additions. It will range from residential all the way to industrial use <br />with some retail space, educational space with some incubator space for new development. <br />Because that is not allowed under a single zone we have come through the PUD requirements. <br />The PUD requirements for setbacks and landscaping for this entire area as well as parking ratios <br />will mostly be phased in. What Matthew has shown you on our preliminary site plan are Building <br />One-Hundred and Thirteen (113) and Building One-Hundred and Twelve (112) which are old <br />Studebaker buildings. (Petitioner begins a slideshow) We are showing a two (2) part development. <br />A surface parking lot for approximately three-hundred and fifty (350) cars and at some point that <br />surface parking lot will be rebuilt into a five (5) story parking garage. Because of the amount of <br />square footage this PUD has as it develops, more parking will be required per the City Code. We <br />will go from three-hundred and fifty (350) to somewhere in the area of sixteen-hundred (1600). It <br />will take several years to fully build out. <br /> <br />Committee of the Whole Chairperson Dieter asked for questions from the Council. <br /> <br />Derek Dieter, Chairperson of Committee of the Whole asked if there was anyone wishing to speak <br />in favor or against and saw none. <br /> <br />Councilmember Valerie Schey made a motion send the Bill 39-15 to the Council with a favorable <br />recommendation. Councilmember Gavin Ferlic seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote <br />of seven (7) ayes. <br /> <br />67-15 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE <br />CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS <br />OF CHAPTER 6, ARTICLES 1, 2,4, 6, 7, AND 11 OF THE SOUTH <br />BEND MUNICIPAL CODE ADDRESSING MINIMUM PERMIT FEES AND <br />SERVICE CHARGES OF THE BUILDING. <br /> <br />Dr. Varner, Zoning and Annexation Committee, reported that they met this afternoon on this bill <br />and due to a lack of quorum there is no recommendation. <br /> <br />Presenter: Charles Bulot of the Building Department - I apologize for my no show at the <br />committee meeting today. The Common Council recently approved a budget for the Building <br />Department with a proposed fee increase as part of our revenue. That increase is a combination <br />of an increase in the minimum permit fee amount from $30 to $40 and the contractor registration <br />fee from $100 to $125 annually, there are no other proposals to the fee structure at this time. <br />Since 2012 there has been a twenty-four percent (24%) increase in expenses for the Building <br />Department on a per permit basis. Although we show a surplus when you consider all permit <br />revenue the minimum permit fee does not cover our cost on a permit basis. We make money on <br />our permit when we combine all revenue. We actually lose money when we do an inspection on <br />a minimum fee permit. The permit fee structure is operating exactly as planned. The question is <br />can we do a larger increase so we don’t have to keep coming back every year? The simple truth <br />is no. Twenty-seven percent (27%) of all permits are minimum fee permits. Twenty-four (24%) <br />of all permits are for utility reconnects. Most of the utility reconnects take place from November <br />to February and are by people in need. As government officials it is our duty to make sure <br />residents get good value and good government. Can we make the permit fee 100 or 500, sure, <br />but that’s probably out of the reach for a family of five (5) that is struggling to keep the heat on <br />in the middle of winter. I think this fee increase is good compromise. I ask for your time and <br />consideration of this fee increase. <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />