Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING October 26, 2015 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />PUD to GB General Business District. Parcel two (2) on the west is requesting a zoning change <br />from to PUD to make some modifications to what their uses are. The site is bordered primarily by <br />single family homes to the north, west, and south. The Elk’s Lodge is on the east zoned CB to <br />Business District, the South Bend Self Storage is now in the former Target site. The parking lot is <br />being occupied by new vehicles for one of the car dealerships. Presenter displayed slide show of <br />images. The tree line of the larger parcel is essentially where outdoor storage would be permitted. <br />Where the shrubs are would be a good indicator of where the storage would be. On the large parcel, <br />on the left, the PUD will allow for uses both allowed in SF1 and SF2; MF1 and MF2; LB, CB, that <br />will be for this entire parcel here (indicated on slide show). The petitioner will also be allowed use <br />within the GB, general business. Area Plan also sends this to you favorably. <br /> <br />Michael Danch, 1643 Commerce Dr. - We are adding GB uses to the originally approved PUD for <br />the McKinley site. We are limiting the area where they could do outside storage on this PUD. It <br />pretty much matches what Council approved when we did South Bend Storage LLC which is right <br />next door. There will be a two-hundred (200) foot buffer for the outside storage. Plus we will <br />have to do some landscaping. All we are doing on Hickory, where they are already storing cars, is <br />changing the zone which would allow for that use. Which means that parcel will have to come <br />into compliance with that zoning and add landscaping to buffer that site from residential from the <br />north. <br /> <br />Committee of the Whole Chairperson, Dieter, asked for questions from the council. <br /> <br />Derek Dieter, Chairperson of Committee of the Whole asked if there was anyone wishing to speak <br />in favor or against and saw none. <br /> <br />Councilmember Gavin Ferlic made a motion send the Bill 38-15 to the Council with a favorable <br />recommendation. Council President Tim Scott seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote <br />of seven (7) ayes. <br /> <br /> <br />39-15 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE <br />FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE 635 SOUTH LAFAYETTE <br />BOULEVARD, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, COUNCILMANIC DISTRICT <br />NO. 4 IN THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA <br /> <br />Derek Dieter, Zoning and Annexation Committee, reported that they met this afternoon on this <br />bill and due to a lack of quorum there is no recommendation. <br /> <br />Presenter: Matthew Chappuies of Area Plan: Offices on the 11th Floor: This is former Studebaker <br />assembly plant on Lafayette. The petitioner is requesting a change from GI, general industrial to <br />PUD. To the north of the property is the former Union Station tech firm. To the east across <br />Lafayette are industrial and office uses zoned LI, light industrial. To the south is the St. Joseph <br />County Correctional Facility and the west is the City Services building. Presenter begins a <br />slideshow presentation. The site is 13.2 acres and 750,000 sq. ft. in its existing structures. The <br />PUD would allow for uses that fall under educational, entertainment, lobbying, industrial, office, <br />personal services, residential, retail, restaurant manufacturing, warehousing, and several others. <br />Adult business would be prohibited. I will leave the rest of the presentation to the petitioner. Area <br />Plan received a letter from the St. Joseph County Historic District in support of this petitioner. <br />Area Plan also sends this to you favorably. <br /> <br />Councilmember Valerie Schey – Do you know where we are with the environmental issues? <br /> <br />Presenter: Matthew Chappuies of Area Plan: I do not know where we are with those issues. <br /> <br />th <br />Brock Zeeb, Community Investment 14 Floor - We are actually entering Phase I and Phase II <br />with Indiana Brown Fields. They have been submitted to the state. As far as Community <br />Investment, we believe we’ve done all the necessary clean up. Indiana Brown Fields will let us <br />know if they agree with that conclusion. Any discussion with Indiana Brown Fields we will have <br />on behalf of redevelopment. The removable portion of the cleanup has been completed, lead based <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />