My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06232016 Agenda Review Session
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
06232016 Agenda Review Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 1:43:36 PM
Creation date
7/13/2016 8:55:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
6/23/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AGENDA REVIEW SESSION JUNE 23, 2016 212 <br />get it renewed. Mr. O'Connor noted historically the Board approves a one year renewal on all <br />contracts. He stated IBM has an option for a three (3) year agreement he would like to have the <br />Board consider to avoid yearly increases. He requested the Board entertain this idea in 2017, not <br />this year. He stated it would save up to $6,000 to $10,000 over the period. Mr. Gilot noted they <br />aren't going to change to another service for $200,000 in equipment, adding to reprogram this <br />equipment would be a huge undertaking, IIe agreed in this case, it makes sense. Ms. Dorau asked <br />how often the scope is reviewed. Mr. O'Connor stated when it's up for renewal it is reviewed <br />and any new or obsolete equipment is added or removed at that time. He noted they now have a <br />cloud based solution that he would like to analyze and possibly switch to. Mr. Gilot stated years _ <br />ago they looked at being proactive versus reactive and found it saves so much money to be <br />proactive on this equipment. Mr. Relos asked if there was any problem with funding for three <br />years. Attorney Michael Schmidt stated they'll do an analysis on how to lock up the funding. Mr. <br />O'Connor added they won't do any more than three (3) years. Mr. George King, Purchasing, <br />noted they need to check with finance on whether State Board of Accounts will authorize pre- <br />payment, adding they historically don't. Mr. Gilot stated rather than pre -paying, he would prefer <br />they lock -in to three (3) years, subject to funding, and allocate the funds each year. <br />- Bid Award — 2016 Janitorial Supplies <br />Ms. Toni Laisure, Central Services, stated nine (9) vendors bid on these supplies and eight (9) <br />won some portion. Mr. Gilot asked if she knew the MBE/WBE impact. Mr. George King, <br />Purchasing, stated he could tell the Board that HP, Kabelin, and Sanco are all women owned <br />businesses. He added as the purchase orders are cut, that Minority Business information will be <br />captured. Ms. Laisure noted that thirty-seven (37) items went to local vendors, which is about <br />30% of the bid. Mr. King informed the Board that it's been three (3) years since the city pulled <br />away from the joint bid with the county and the feedback he is receiving is that the vendors <br />aren't bidding on the county bid because they won't do a divisible bid. <br />— Opening of Quotes —North Station Filtration Plant Stainless Steel Pipe Replacement <br />Mr. Ed Herman, Water Works, introduced Mr. Matt Bussell, a new employee for Water Works. <br />Mr. Bussell stated the person formerly in his position started replacing the stainless steel piping <br />several years ago, and he is continuing that process due to weld failures in the pipes. He noted he <br />went through the informal quoting process and all the quotes were above $25,000, so he is doing <br />this through formal quotes now. <br />- Change Orders — One -Way to Two -Way Conversion <br />Mr. Corbitt Kerr, Engineering, stated these two change orders are for numerous changes <br />including the type of paint and street material. He noted there was a 5% bonus for the QCQA <br />material if the contractor performed well, and that was ]ell out of the specifications. Mr. Gilot <br />explained that the difference in the QCQA and the recycled asphalt product (RAP) material is <br />one is smoother, and the other one holds tip better. Mr. Kerr explained the State wants their roads <br />with the QCQA surface material with the bonus included. He stated they asked the State to <br />switch to the RAP but INDOT did not want to switch, so they will be using two different types of <br />materials for state streets and city streets. He noted the City will have the more durable RAP <br />material with no bonus. <br />— Change Order and Project Completion Affidavit — Bus Shelter Installation <br />Mr. Gilot questioned if this was for one (1) bus shelter. Mr. Kerr stated this is for five (5) <br />shelters. <br />No other business came before the Board. Upon a motion by Mr. Rclos, seconded by Ms. <br />Maradik and carried, the meeting adjourned at 11:13 a.m. <br />BOARD OF PUBLIC•WORKS <br />G�� <br />Gary A. ot, President <br />avt ember <br />Elizabeth A. Maradik, Member <br />Therese or,,, e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.