My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/22/06 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
05/22/06 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2007 10:42:46 AM
Creation date
10/17/2007 10:42:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
5/22/2006
Document Relationships
05/22/06 Board of Public Works Regular Meeting Agenda
(Supersedes)
Path:
\Public\Public Works\Agendas\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 2006 'r <br />APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING <br />Upon a motion made by Mr. Littrell, seconded by Mr. Inks, and carried, the minutes of <br />the public agenda session and the regular meeting of the Board held on May 4 and May 8, <br />2006, were approved. <br />PUBLIC HEARING -LICENSE APPLICATION FOR TRANSIENT MERCHANT <br />LICENSE - SHOWTIME FIREWORKS <br />Mr. Inks advised that this was the date set for the Board's Public Hearing concerning a <br />License Application for a Transient Merchant License, as submitted by Mr. Mohamad <br />' Musleh, 1247 Fitzgerald, Munster, Indiana, to conduct the sale of fireworks at the old <br />Blockbuster Building at Lincolnway West and Ardmore Trail, June 4 through July 4, <br />2006. It was noted favorable recommendations have been received from the Fire <br />Department, Building Department, Legal Department and the Police Department. The <br />Fire Department stated the building does not have a sprinkler system and the fireworks <br />must be properly displayed, stored and have proper fire protection. <br />There being no one present wishing to address the Board concerning this matter, the <br />Public Hearing was closed. <br />Therefore, upon a motion made by Mr. Littrell, seconded by Mr. Inks and carried, the <br />License Application was approved, <br />OPENING OF BIDS -SALE OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY - 1201 WEST FORD <br />This was the date set for receiving and opening of sealed bids for the above referred to <br />property. The Clerk tendered proofs of publication of Notice in the South Bend Tribune <br />and the Tri-County News, which were found to be sufficient. The following bid was <br />opened and publicly read: <br />JUAN VARGAS <br />1207 Ford Street <br />' South Bend, Indiana 46619 <br />BID: $900.00 <br />Upon a motion made by Mr. Littrell, seconded by Mr. Inks, and carried, the above bid <br />was referred to the Legal Department for review and recommendation. <br />AWARD BIDS -STREET MATERIALS - PROJECT NO. 106-019 (LRSAI <br />Mr. Sam Hensley, Transportation Director, advised the board that on May 8, 2006, bids <br />were received and opened for the above referred to street materials. After reviewing <br />those bids, Mr. Hensley recommends that the Board award the contract to the lowest, <br />responsive and responsible bidders. <br />Mr., Bodnar stated the Board solicited bids. for twenty-eight (28) different lines of <br />materials and requested a total amount of the base bid. The Director of Transportation <br />wants to award this to the lowest total, even though for six (6) of the .items a different <br />company had a lower bid. The starting base for an analysis is that the contract must be <br />awarded with reasonable promptness by written notice to the lowest responsible and <br />responsive bidder (I.C. 5-22-7-8). The solicitation did not state that a contract would be <br />awarded separately for each line of supplies. Because this solicitation did not qualify <br />under I.C. 5-22-17-12(a), there is no absolute requirement that the Board of Public Works <br />award them to separate companies. While the Board has the power under subsection (b) <br />' to break out individual items, the Board has no obligation to do so and may follow the <br />Director's recommendation. Besides the twenty-eight (28) items; the Board solicited one <br />(1) other item which would be by unit cost only and was not included in the total amount <br />of the base bid. That is to be awarded to the lowest bidder. <br />Thirdly, there were six (6) items for which the Board requested a base bid. Of the three <br />companies bidding on these items, none bid on all of them, two of them bid on four each <br />(non-identical to each other) and the other on two. No bid was made on one item. The <br />Transportation Director recommends that all bids on one other item be rejected and that <br />the other four items be awarded to one company. Of the four items, the winning bidder <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.