My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-10-14 Common Council Meeting Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Common Council Meeting Minutes
>
2014
>
02-10-14 Common Council Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2015 12:39:38 PM
Creation date
8/10/2015 12:44:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING <br />FEBRUARY 10, 2014 <br />Mayor Pete Buttigieg presented his annual address to the City Council pursuant to Section 2 -3.1 <br />of the South Bend Municipal Code. City address will be held on Wednesday of this week. First <br />thing to show was run down of where they stand financially and where to draw your attention to: <br />as predicted the General Fund was announced the numbers were the actual numbers from 2013: <br />made $40,000 of revenue and expenditures were able to keep the targeted balance, Overall <br />revenues come in at 2% below expenditures and largely responsible for enterprise funds in <br />capital spending reserves spent on capital purposes largely on utility related issues. The <br />enterprise fund revenues were lower than expenditures by about 15 million due to the fact that a <br />revenue bond was not issued in the past year where in previous years was did not decline the <br />feed base revenue. 8:30 time Redevelopment revenues were $8million over expenditures with <br />technical revenue declining because we saw redevelopment and partner community investment <br />operating under budget levels that creates room for new growth in the future to an overall <br />positive thing, includes parks and recreations, motor vehicle highway, and lost recovery among <br />other funds. <br />Gave an overview of how the neighbor categories evolve over time, as he mentioned last year in <br />2013 what happened to general fund in 2008 and 2009 one irregularity where taxes were <br />distributed to get a sense of the overall value of those two years you would want to split the <br />difference of the average. General fund is slightly off from 2013 compared to 2012 partly as a <br />consequence of corporations at a set value but broadly consistent. You see the enterprise fund <br />drop off from 12 to 15, primarily driven by waste water revenue bond was not issued in 2013. <br />Also see redevelopment steady, spike in 2010 as it was just a fact that property taxes were <br />collected so you see a fairly steady progression from year to year in all major categories <br />Only thing as we go to the expenditure side that this year pattern holds that we are in the market <br />we higher rated expenditures than enterprise funds as compared to where we were 3 years ago <br />that's a result of the long term control plan kicking in so that a trend that you can expect to <br />continue unless there are measures that drive down the regular expenditures that are required of <br />us in the long term control plan for our obligations on waste water. You can also see an uptick <br />in debt capital projects a lot of that is the fire department station go live this past year, not quite <br />ready to cut ribbon on the Luther Taylor fire training center is near completion as we look to <br />those funds from last year the number will be a little bit higher than we are used to seeing <br />Showed a chart overtime showing how overall revenues can stack up, part of this can be a little <br />misleading because if you think of this just as a flow or keeping up more than we take in than <br />you would leave out the numbers when you do issue a bond, that's part of what you're seeing <br />here, If you measure the space between the blue line and the red line that's the creation of extra <br />funding during the bond issue that's what happened in 2012 that's what makes it possible to be <br />under the incoming revenue in 2013, just want to bear in mind the blue dot represents the <br />revenue under the red dot represents the expenditures the general fund was not that balanced <br />when it came to 2013. <br />This is a closer view on the general funds in particular, the property taxes receipts throws off <br />2008 and 2009 the bottom line the finance team has done a good job in working with the council <br />and anticipating the budget process how the revenue expenditures are going to fall out and that's <br />allowing us to keep those dots as close together as possible. Some revenues you might be <br />surprised to learn from where most of all the revenue comes from: Would like to highlight the <br />breakdown of revenue comes from charges and services: sewer and water bills are the single <br />biggest source of dollars that would be fees related to waste water, water, solid waste; we also <br />get parks revenue, followed by property taxes which comes from the general fund, parks as well <br />as the hall of fame and tip funds, intergovernmental funds doesn't capture internal transfers <br />covers funds that come from the state branch like federal government and pension release, <br />transfers in you can think of as an accounting artifact, this is how they account for the dollars <br />that move around their department. Local income tax includes both public safety and county <br />option income tax, bond proceeds lower number this year then you might be used to seeing just <br />as a result of the waste water bond. In terms of where the dollars are going public safety <br />accounts for the biggest account followed by water and sewer, so when you add those two <br />together they serve the majority of what the city expenditures go to are basic services like life <br />support making sure the basics are easy for citizens, Highlighted this slither on the chart, as the <br />general government category as the overhead which includes administration and finance team, <br />legal team, and all of us city council and mayor's office budgets in this category. Vast majority <br />general fund dollars goes to public safety this is one of the reasons for the supported property tax <br />in our budgets, careful to make sure there is predictability and adequacy in the amount of taxes <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.