Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting – August 28, 2014 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />B. Northeast Neighborhood Development Area <br />(1) continued... <br />Mr. Rompola clarified that the Airport is an Economic Development Area so is more focused <br />on jobs, but the existing Downtown TIF area was designated as a Redevelopment area —a <br />blighted area —when it was established. The statute has changed and no longer talks about <br />blight, but rather an area needing redevelopment. The inclusion of the Lincolnway West and <br />Western Corridors is in some part trying to be proactive and anticipating future changes to <br />the TIF legislation. Whereas, under current law, we could possibly make expenditure along <br />the corridors without having them actually included in the TIF boundaries (but serving the <br />TIF), it is anticipated the Legislature may change that provision to exclude the option of <br />serving the greater TIF area. Several cities are using this rationale when declaring or <br />expanding their TIF districts. <br />Mr. Inks asked whether the Downtown TIF (aka SBCDA) is being released. Mr. Ford <br />answered no, the Central Medical is being released, but not the Downtown. Mr. Relos added <br />that the portion of the SBCDA west of the River is being transferred AEDA and the SBCDA <br />portion east of the River is being transferred to the NNDA. <br />Mr. Inks asked how these changes affect the life of each of the TIFs under current legislation. <br />Mr. Rompola answered the existing areas which are being transferred are under the new <br />statutory amendment so that the "legacy TIF" of the Downtown and Airport (or any which <br />did not originally have an expiration date) would have an expiration date of 2025 or after any <br />supported debt is retired — whichever is later. The new expansion areas would have a 25 year <br />limitation. However, some of the TIFs were expanded over the years and some of those <br />pockets may have their own termination dates. So, essentially everything which is being <br />transferred will keep their existing termination dates and nothing will be extended unless new <br />debt is added. <br />Mr. Inks also asked for clarity on the percentage of assessed value (AV) for the area. As <br />presented, AV is going up slightly but wouldn't that be total AV for the area - -- wouldn't <br />Increment AV be going down because there are some areas which are being released? Also, <br />has staff given any thought to capping the annual amount of TIF that is used by <br />Redevelopment? This would allow at least a partial sharing of AV from new development <br />with the other taxing units. <br />Mr. Ford answered that this geographic change allows for a more plan- driven agenda such as <br />the Corridor Plan's specific cost of services. In addition, because we have gone through a <br />parcel -by- parcel analysis we have a better understanding of what we should receive and can <br />follow up more effectively. There is also a direct correlation between TIF expenditure and <br />job creation —this year it is about $17,000 /job created (almost 1300 jobs announced to date <br />