Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting – August 28, 2014 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />B. Northeast Neighborhood Development Area <br />(1) continued... <br />Dr. Varner stated these effects need to be re- iterated to the public often so that it becomes <br />clearly understood. He also noted he found the proposed timeline to be aggressive because <br />this matter will likely generate more questions than anticipated, even with the best attempt at <br />clarity. We want to ensure the public has a good understanding. <br />Mr. Ford emphasized staff is committed to answering all questions. The timeline was <br />established with an eye toward completing the process in conjunction with the passage of the <br />2015 City budget. We understand we have an opportunity to set the budget before October <br />31' or after January I". So, we can amend the budget(s) in early 2015, if necessary. <br />Ms. Schey echoed Dr. Varner's comments about the timeline. Commissioners were given <br />the maps on Monday, August 25', as is normal, for consideration at today's meeting. There <br />is much research to be done. As Deputy Mayor Mark Neal noted in his opening comments <br />about the 2015 budget, the circuit breaker has dropped South Bend's funding by 31 %. These <br />losses have been increasing each year and will continue to grow resulting in cuts to City <br />expenditures to adapt to these changes. She asked what percentage of the City's land would <br />be captured by the TIF? <br />Mr. Ford answered we are currently at 34% of land in TIF areas and under the new <br />boundaries would be at 37 %. Most importantly, from the fiscal position, the change would <br />be flat —as noted previously —from 30.64% to 30.85 %. This still includes the West <br />Washington TIF. Mr. Ford further explained staff had considered carving out certain <br />sections but found some options to transfer roughly $300,000 from local taxing units to the <br />State. Weighing fiscal stewardship for our local community, we opted to avoid those trade- <br />offs. The TIFs are an option to fund infrastructure by taking pressure off the General Fund. <br />Ms. Schey questioned whether we are expanding the intended scope of TIF as she does not <br />see Downtown as blighted. She also believes Downtown already has a number of funds <br />dedicated to its area. She further pointed out an area in the expansion and asked whether it is <br />in the Near Northwest Neighborhood and doesn't this area have benefit of CDBG dollars? <br />Ms Schey was concerned that some areas of town do not have specialized funds available to <br />them. <br />Mr. Ford noted that area Ms. Schey identified is the right of way of the rail —the former coal <br />line —which goes up to the Drewrey's parcel. It is in the Near Northwest part of town, but <br />we are unsure if it is within the NNN's defined boundaries. This was identified in the <br />Corridor Plan as an opportunity to build a trail <br />0 <br />