My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-14 Council Agenda & Packet
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Common Council Agenda Packets
>
2014
>
05-28-14 Council Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2014 1:26:09 PM
Creation date
5/22/2014 1:22:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Agendas
City Counci - Date
5/28/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3 <br />parking are existing, and have been as shown for the past few decades. <br />The Petitioners would like to continue to use this paved surface area <br />and parking. The proposed Canopy over the pumps would be new, but due to <br />the SF 2- Residential zoning surrounding the property, there is a 30 ft. <br />wide Residential Bufferyard that restricts the location of the proposed <br />Canopy, pumps and the location of pavement, walks and parking. Due to <br />the layout of the site with the existing building located towards the <br />South portion of the site with a parking bay along the North side of <br />said building, the only portion of the site left to locate the proposed <br />gasoline dispensing facility is along the North and West portion of the <br />property. This location creates the encroachment into the residential <br />bufferyard. The Canopy and pumps meet the typical 15 ft. setback <br />required in the "LB" Local Business District development standard, but <br />in this situation, the residential component adds an additional 15 ft. <br />to the setbacks along the two street frontages. The Petitioners do not <br />believe this requested Variance would have a detrimental impact on the <br />surrounding properties. <br />The second Variance request is from the requirement of providing <br />perimeter trees at a minimum rate of one (1) over -story deciduous tree <br />every forty (40) feet along the North, East, South and West property <br />lines to providing a minimum of three (3) trees along the West property <br />line and use existing trees along the South property line. The <br />Petitioners would state that this property has existing overhead main <br />power lines running along the North and East sides of the property and a <br />smaller power line feeding site security lighting along a portion of the <br />West property line. The location of these lines, prevent any over -story <br />trees from being placed in the area of the utility lines. The <br />Petitioners have shown placement of three over -story trees along the <br />portion of Olive Street (West side) not encumbered by utility lines. <br />Along the South side of the property the owners would ask to be allowed <br />to keep the existing dense vegetation. The Petitioners do not believe <br />approval of this request would have an adverse affect on surrounding <br />properties. <br />The third Variance request is from the requirement of providing a <br />minimum of a 6 ft. wide landscape planting area along the Elwood Avenue <br />fagade of the existing building to no landscaping and to a minimum of 15 <br />shrubs along the Olive Street £agade as shown. The Petitioners would <br />state at the time the existing building was constructed there was not a <br />requirement for a landscape bed along the frontage of the building <br />facing the street. They would ask to be able to keep the existing front <br />walk as shown and not be required to add a new planting bed in front of <br />the existing building. The Petitioners have shown that they will add <br />shrubbery along the West side of the building to create a new landscape <br />area between Olive Street and the West face of the building. The <br />Petitioners do not believe approval of this request would have a <br />negative impact on any surrounding property. The Petitioners believe <br />they are attempting to meet the intent of the City's Ordinances on this <br />issue. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.