My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6B(1)
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Agendas & Packets
>
2014
>
03-27-14 Redevelopment Commission Meeting
>
6B(1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2014 12:40:16 PM
Creation date
3/24/2014 12:39:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Chris Dressel <br /> March 4,2014 <br /> Page 5 of 18 <br /> penetrating radar survey for the Site to identify the potential presence of features such as <br /> previously abandoned and/or removed USTs, cisterns, and tunnels, as well as the presence of <br /> possible fill materials from prior demolition activities. The results of the survey revealed no <br /> indications of subsurface anomalies consistent with the presence of buried USTs but did reveal <br /> indications consistent with UST(s) being removed and then the excavation being backfilled. In <br /> addition, south of Building 113, numerous foundations and buried debris were identified from <br /> previous buildings that once stood across the Site. Within one foundation there are indications of <br /> significant debris,possibly from the historical demolition activities. <br /> To promote redevelopment of the property and to satisfy potential lending institutions, Weaver <br /> Boos understands that the current owner, Studebaker Building 84, LLC, seeks a liability <br /> exemption letter or other closure confirmation from IDEM for the documented environmental <br /> concerns as described in the WPI Phase I and II ESA reports and recent findings regarding the <br /> PCB-impacted concrete and possibly soil within one former transformer room. Potential liability <br /> exemption letters from the IBP (referred to herein as "IBP Letters") include a Bona Fide <br /> Prospective Purchaser (BFPP) Comfort Letter, a Lender Liability Comfort Letter, a <br /> Contaminated Aquifer letter, a Site Status Letter and a No Further Action(NFA) Letter from the <br /> IBP. In the alternative, a party can seek an NFA issued from the Indiana State Cleanup Program <br /> (SCP), or a Certificate of Completion and Covenant Not to Sue Letter (CNS) from the Indiana <br /> Voluntary Remediation Program. <br /> Based on our understanding of the intentions of the property owner regarding redevelopment, <br /> possible lending institution requirements, project timetable, present documented environmental <br /> conditions associated with the property, and consultation with environmental counsel, the <br /> specific path forward for addressing the environmental conditions will be determined after <br /> receiving the results of the initial sampling proposed herein, as well as potentially further <br /> discussions with IDEM. For purposes of this proposal, Weaver Boos assumes that the owner <br /> will be pursuing an IBP Letter but if the site is placed into the SCP or VRP, this proposal will <br /> need to be amended to reflect the additional work involved. . <br /> Note that if the owner proceeds with the IBP,if at any time during the process an imminent threat <br /> to human health or the environment is identified or off-site properties are impacted, as a result of <br /> a source on-site, then the site maybe transferred from the IBP to the Indiana SCP. A remediation <br /> workplan (RWP) and remedial completion report will be required to be submitted and a NFA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.