Laserfiche WebLink
873 <br />7TH. 1953 <br />Mr. Erler wants more home rule. He seems to distrust the Federal government which he and rest of us created* <br />The Federal government does not build the houses. Private builders do, after competitive bidding. His saying <br />that housing projects were administered poorly because'it was political was just like the women who disagreed <br />with his zoning decision and yelled from the balcony that it was "politics "g She was expressing the same lack <br />of confidence in him as he expressed in the men in Washington. Was either performance worthy of our democracy? <br />He accused the Federal government of paying 3% instead of the 10f of the shelter rent which the law calls for, <br />and of building unsuitable structures. Life Magazines in the October 27, 1952 issue did not condemn those 15- <br />story buildings as unsuited to life in a crowded city where vertical living is a necessity The state and city <br />felt that it was worth what it cost them. All this is in the hands of the local governing body, and if there <br />is mismanagement, it is because the city has failed in its responsibility to hire the proper director, whose <br />duty it is to enforce the regulations set up by law. <br />It was unfair for Mr. Erler to speak for the whole Council, especially since he was sitting in the Chair and he <br />was not authorized to present their views. As a matter of fact, the 10f shelter rent is not only paid promptly, <br />as a rule, but it is at least equal to, if not greater than what the city collected in taxes from the shacks that <br />occupied the area before reclamation began. It may be true that business enterprises on the same ground might <br />pay more, but at what a cost to the conscience of a city whose progress depends on the welfare of the people <br />who live in it. <br />Mr. Erler was upset by the possibility that indigent and low income families might live as decently as a middle <br />class family Should that not be a source of pride to a city? The director of the Benton Harbor project was <br />proud of the educational job they were doing. They were teaching people who did not know how to use modern <br />plumbing and appliances; they were inspecting the homes regularly and helping these people to understand <br />responsibility for the things they found in their new surroundings. There are always a few who will never <br />improve themselves. But to use these few as the excuse to deprive the many who yearn for a decent home in which <br />to bring up their children is to make a mockery of the purpose for which government was created. A housing <br />project in Maggiets Court could be the source of great pride to our city, and a potential force for good. <br />All we can hope for in this matter is that you Council members will open your.minds and study the facts. Weigh <br />them against the prejudices and pressures of self - interested groups,'and you will surely decide that action is <br />needed. If projects have succeeded elsewhere, the one we have started here has as good a chance for success. <br />In closing, I would like to quote Mr. Place, who said to one realtor, "Until you see this through your heart, <br />you won't; understand." With your minds aware of facts, and your hearts full of understanding for those who are <br />in desperate need of decent living conditions, we will surely find you leading the community to the solution <br />of this problem. <br />Sincerely yours, <br />(Mrs* A.M,) Rose R. Shulman <br />Councilman Niezgodski made a motion that the communication be accepted and placed on file. Councilman Bestle <br />seconded the motion._ Motion carried. <br />PETITION <br />Gentlemen: <br />We, the undersigned property owners, petition your honorable body to enforce load limit on W Indiana Ave. f rom <br />So. Olive St, to Prairie Ave. <br />(126 Signatures) <br />Councilman Korpal made a motion that the petition be referred to the Board of Public Works tp enforce load limit <br />on W. Indiana Aveā€¢ from So. Olive St. to Prairie Ave. and report back to the Council. Councilman Pinter seconded <br />the motion. Motion carried. <br />PETITION <br />TO: The Honorable Members of the Common <br />Council of the City of South Bend <br />The undersigned respectfully petition the Common' Council of the City of South Bend, as follows <br />1. To re -zone the following described real estate located in the City of South Bend, County of <br />St. Joseph and State of Indiana, to -wit: <br />Beginning at a point 280.7 feet east, and 232 feet south of the northwest corner <br />of the east one -half of the northeast quarter of Section Four, Towaship"Thirty -seven <br />North, Range two east ;thence east on a line parallel to and 232 feet south of the <br />north line of said section four, 148.14 feet; thence south parallel with the east <br />line of the west half of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said <br />section four, a distance of 317.42 feet to the center line of Lincoln way (Lincoln <br />Trail); thence Northwesterly along the center line of said Lincoln Way 160 feet; <br />thence North a distance of 250991 feet to the place of beginning, <br />from Class A Residential District and Class A Height and Area District, to Class C Commercial District and Class <br />D Height and Area District. <br />2. To re -zone the following described real estate located in the City of South Bend, County,of <br />St. Joseph and State of Indiana, to -wit: <br />A parcel of land bounded by a line running as follows: beginning at a point on the <br />north line of Section 4, Township 37 north, range 2 east, 280.7 feet east of the <br />northwest corner of the east half of the northeast quarter of said section 4; thence <br />continuing east along the north line of said section 4, 148.14 feet; thence south <br />parallel with the east line of the west half of the northwest quarter of the north- <br />east quarter of said section 4, a distance of 232 feet; thence west on a line parallel <br />to and 232 feet south of the north line of section 4, a distance of 148.14 feet; thenoe <br />north a distance of 232 feet to the place of beginnings <br />from Class A Residential District and Class A Height and Area District, to Class D Light Industrial District and <br />Class E Height and Area District. <br />