Be it remembered that the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, met in regular session in the
<br />Council Chamber, Monday, April 27th, 1953, at 7:12 P.M., Central Standard Time (8 :00 P.M. C.D.T.), with all
<br />members present except Councilman_Muszynski.. President Erler presided.
<br />REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON MINUTES
<br />To the Common Council of the City of South Bend:
<br />Your Committee on the inspection and supervision of the minutes, would respectfully report that they have
<br />inspected the minutes of the previous meeting of the Council and found them correct. They therefore recommend
<br />that the same be approved.
<br />Meeting of April 13th, 19539
<br />(Signed) WALTER C.. ERLER SR. )
<br />" STANLEY C. KORPAL ) Committee
<br />" W. A. HAHN )
<br />Councilman Glass made a motion that the report be accepted. Councilman Bestle seconded the motion. Motion
<br />carried.
<br />CONMUNICATION
<br />City Council
<br />South Bend, Indiana
<br />Gentlemen:
<br />1403 Chester Street
<br />South Bend, Ind.
<br />April 22, 1953
<br />I was present at the last Council meeting when things were said which concern me. Mr. Erler expressed views
<br />which were 'challenged by only one member. Before dealing with them, may I express my appreciation for your
<br />endless hours of work, and the wisdom and patience with which you try to meet the many problems of our city.
<br />Also, there is a sort of apology due you. Only the Public Improvements Committee was asked to a housing meeting
<br />at Hering House, and neither arrived nor informed the people waiting that they were not coming. But the point
<br />of the-remarks made concerning the Council's lack of information remains valid.
<br />The whole Council had been invited, each one by letter, to go on a tour of the housing project in Benton Harbor
<br />last fall, which was sponsored by the Women's Council for Human Relations. Not one member was interested enough
<br />to find out at first hand what that city had done to solve the housing problem for indigents and low income
<br />families in slum areas and in sub- standard homes. In addition, when committees of women visited the new members
<br />of the Council, whose views on housing were not known, it was found that lack of information did not concern them.
<br />The only one who was even receptive to information was Mr. Hahn.
<br />Because Mr. Place made the trip to Benton Harbor and ponvinc6dhimself of the facts at first hand, he could speak
<br />with conviction before you about the responsibility of government for this type of housing* He readily admits
<br />that private builders cannot meet the need. The 290 units in Benton Harbor is run by the former city building
<br />inspector, T. E. Agens. He would be glad to come to South Bend to confer with the public improvements committee,
<br />or the council as a whole. He will tell them, as he told us, that the project had the backing of the whole
<br />community, real estate men and builderss included, and that a properly administered project does not need a
<br />subsidy because the rents could cover all costs of operations
<br />From the Memphis, Tenn, Housing Authority's annual report', issued
<br />in January, 1953, I would like to quote the following paragraphs
<br />x "It should also be pointed out that while we are eligible to receive
<br />Federal subsidy to offset extremely low rentals, we have been able
<br />to meet all our obligations for seven straight years without the
<br />need of this subsidy. In other words, public housing is paying
<br />its way and still doing the,job for which it was intended."
<br />We were also told in Benton Harbor that residents stay no longer than is absolutely necessary because they, too,
<br />work toward improving their status, and toward home ownership* In Memphis last year, of 3,341 tenants,, 892
<br />families left the 'project, either because they had improved their income beyond the limit set for renters, or
<br />were ready to buy their own home. Ninety -three bought homes•
<br />Mr. Erler calls Federal Housing "socialistic ". I wonder if he ever read the lawl Senator Taft, who sponsored
<br />the 1949 Housing Act would resent being caalled. a "socialist ". This bill subsidizes builders of big subdivisions
<br />as Mr. Place explained at the last Council meeting; it insures-loans for those who have enough money to make a
<br />down- payment to buy a house; it provides help for building farm homes. Why are all these subsidies not socialis
<br />while lifting the standard of living of the low income group is so considered? These people are subsidized now
<br />by tax payers thru welfare, and thru the exhorbitant cost of police, delinquenoy, health and crime. The prisons
<br />are packed with men, many of whom trace their plight to ack of decent living conditions when they were children.
<br />We pay and pay for our disregard of the primary causes.
<br />Then Mr. Erler mentioned the suits filed against certain cities for millions of dollarsl This is true. But
<br />what he did not say was that South Bend is also in line to be sued and for the same reasons. Throughout the
<br />country, on the strength of a contract signed by the ppoper city officials and the government in Washington,
<br />money was advanced to local Housing Authorities appointed by the Mayor, with which to purchase land and for
<br />other needs. For a variety of reasons, and due to pressures from various interests, the projects were stopped
<br />at one stage or another. The Federal government is suing so that either the cities live up to their contracts
<br />or the contracts be voided and the cities return the money they have spent*
<br />In South Bend, a contract was signed and the land known as "Maggie's Court" was purchased in the early 19401s,
<br />and condemnation proceedings were started. Some families were moved out and given priority in the proposed
<br />project as the law prescribed. Some are still living there in both rehabilitated and substandard homes* All
<br />that remains is for the pity Council to sign the authorization for -the sale of the bonds which would be repaid
<br />from the rentals. It would cost the city nothing. Yet the Council has refused to approve the financing for a
<br />project, the need for which was demonstrated even before the Housing Authority was set up. Therefore, a law
<br />suit is in the offing. With the passage of years, I am told that Maggie's Court has become valuable business
<br />property. If the Federal government loses its suit and the land is sold to business men, we will have a further
<br />aggravated shortage of low rental housing because these people will have no place to go*
<br />Mayor Joseph E.- ,Finerty of Gary, Indiana, issued a report showing the actual savings to his city by providing
<br />some 800 decent housing units for those who need it. Other cities' reports are available to the Council, if
<br />they would really become interested in facts, nor fiction. Gary's income from personal property taxes rose from
<br />$19 to $31 per family The Township Trustee saved $9 plus the cost of utilities per family per month in rentals.
<br />The housing project furnishes street lighting, library space, recreation space and equipment, fire hydrants,
<br />sanitary inspection and other public services, so the city saved all that expense. The rate of fire calls fell
<br />from 1 call to 25 families annually to 1 call to 400 families. There were fewer deaths from tuberculosis and
<br />pneumonia and far fewer illegitimate births. The report shows that 15% more youngsters stay in school and the
<br />general scholarship level of all the children rose.
<br />
|