Laserfiche WebLink
Be it remembered that the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, met in regular session in the <br />Council Chamber, Monday, April 27th, 1953, at 7:12 P.M., Central Standard Time (8 :00 P.M. C.D.T.), with all <br />members present except Councilman_Muszynski.. President Erler presided. <br />REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON MINUTES <br />To the Common Council of the City of South Bend: <br />Your Committee on the inspection and supervision of the minutes, would respectfully report that they have <br />inspected the minutes of the previous meeting of the Council and found them correct. They therefore recommend <br />that the same be approved. <br />Meeting of April 13th, 19539 <br />(Signed) WALTER C.. ERLER SR. ) <br />" STANLEY C. KORPAL ) Committee <br />" W. A. HAHN ) <br />Councilman Glass made a motion that the report be accepted. Councilman Bestle seconded the motion. Motion <br />carried. <br />CONMUNICATION <br />City Council <br />South Bend, Indiana <br />Gentlemen: <br />1403 Chester Street <br />South Bend, Ind. <br />April 22, 1953 <br />I was present at the last Council meeting when things were said which concern me. Mr. Erler expressed views <br />which were 'challenged by only one member. Before dealing with them, may I express my appreciation for your <br />endless hours of work, and the wisdom and patience with which you try to meet the many problems of our city. <br />Also, there is a sort of apology due you. Only the Public Improvements Committee was asked to a housing meeting <br />at Hering House, and neither arrived nor informed the people waiting that they were not coming. But the point <br />of the-remarks made concerning the Council's lack of information remains valid. <br />The whole Council had been invited, each one by letter, to go on a tour of the housing project in Benton Harbor <br />last fall, which was sponsored by the Women's Council for Human Relations. Not one member was interested enough <br />to find out at first hand what that city had done to solve the housing problem for indigents and low income <br />families in slum areas and in sub- standard homes. In addition, when committees of women visited the new members <br />of the Council, whose views on housing were not known, it was found that lack of information did not concern them. <br />The only one who was even receptive to information was Mr. Hahn. <br />Because Mr. Place made the trip to Benton Harbor and ponvinc6dhimself of the facts at first hand, he could speak <br />with conviction before you about the responsibility of government for this type of housing* He readily admits <br />that private builders cannot meet the need. The 290 units in Benton Harbor is run by the former city building <br />inspector, T. E. Agens. He would be glad to come to South Bend to confer with the public improvements committee, <br />or the council as a whole. He will tell them, as he told us, that the project had the backing of the whole <br />community, real estate men and builderss included, and that a properly administered project does not need a <br />subsidy because the rents could cover all costs of operations <br />From the Memphis, Tenn, Housing Authority's annual report', issued <br />in January, 1953, I would like to quote the following paragraphs <br />x "It should also be pointed out that while we are eligible to receive <br />Federal subsidy to offset extremely low rentals, we have been able <br />to meet all our obligations for seven straight years without the <br />need of this subsidy. In other words, public housing is paying <br />its way and still doing the,job for which it was intended." <br />We were also told in Benton Harbor that residents stay no longer than is absolutely necessary because they, too, <br />work toward improving their status, and toward home ownership* In Memphis last year, of 3,341 tenants,, 892 <br />families left the 'project, either because they had improved their income beyond the limit set for renters, or <br />were ready to buy their own home. Ninety -three bought homes• <br />Mr. Erler calls Federal Housing "socialistic ". I wonder if he ever read the lawl Senator Taft, who sponsored <br />the 1949 Housing Act would resent being caalled. a "socialist ". This bill subsidizes builders of big subdivisions <br />as Mr. Place explained at the last Council meeting; it insures-loans for those who have enough money to make a <br />down- payment to buy a house; it provides help for building farm homes. Why are all these subsidies not socialis <br />while lifting the standard of living of the low income group is so considered? These people are subsidized now <br />by tax payers thru welfare, and thru the exhorbitant cost of police, delinquenoy, health and crime. The prisons <br />are packed with men, many of whom trace their plight to ack of decent living conditions when they were children. <br />We pay and pay for our disregard of the primary causes. <br />Then Mr. Erler mentioned the suits filed against certain cities for millions of dollarsl This is true. But <br />what he did not say was that South Bend is also in line to be sued and for the same reasons. Throughout the <br />country, on the strength of a contract signed by the ppoper city officials and the government in Washington, <br />money was advanced to local Housing Authorities appointed by the Mayor, with which to purchase land and for <br />other needs. For a variety of reasons, and due to pressures from various interests, the projects were stopped <br />at one stage or another. The Federal government is suing so that either the cities live up to their contracts <br />or the contracts be voided and the cities return the money they have spent* <br />In South Bend, a contract was signed and the land known as "Maggie's Court" was purchased in the early 19401s, <br />and condemnation proceedings were started. Some families were moved out and given priority in the proposed <br />project as the law prescribed. Some are still living there in both rehabilitated and substandard homes* All <br />that remains is for the pity Council to sign the authorization for -the sale of the bonds which would be repaid <br />from the rentals. It would cost the city nothing. Yet the Council has refused to approve the financing for a <br />project, the need for which was demonstrated even before the Housing Authority was set up. Therefore, a law <br />suit is in the offing. With the passage of years, I am told that Maggie's Court has become valuable business <br />property. If the Federal government loses its suit and the land is sold to business men, we will have a further <br />aggravated shortage of low rental housing because these people will have no place to go* <br />Mayor Joseph E.- ,Finerty of Gary, Indiana, issued a report showing the actual savings to his city by providing <br />some 800 decent housing units for those who need it. Other cities' reports are available to the Council, if <br />they would really become interested in facts, nor fiction. Gary's income from personal property taxes rose from <br />$19 to $31 per family The Township Trustee saved $9 plus the cost of utilities per family per month in rentals. <br />The housing project furnishes street lighting, library space, recreation space and equipment, fire hydrants, <br />sanitary inspection and other public services, so the city saved all that expense. The rate of fire calls fell <br />from 1 call to 25 families annually to 1 call to 400 families. There were fewer deaths from tuberculosis and <br />pneumonia and far fewer illegitimate births. The report shows that 15% more youngsters stay in school and the <br />general scholarship level of all the children rose. <br />