Be it remembered that the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, met in the Committee of the Whole in the
<br />Council Chambers, City Hall, on Monday, August 28, 1961, at 8:03 P.M., with all members present. The meeting was
<br />called to order by Councilman T. W. Lehman, Chairman, who presided.
<br />Councilman Lehman introduced Mayor Bruggner, who read the following address:
<br />MEMBERS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL, DEPARTMENT HEADS, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN:
<br />Firstly, I would like to thank and commend all of the department heads of our city government for their cooperation in
<br />following my suggestion to "Hold the Line" wherever possible on the expenditures for 1962. As you have found in
<br />the examination of the proposed budget, no salary increases have been requested and I firmly believe that the proposed
<br />budget reflects one of the basic premises of this administration: Economy and Efficiency.
<br />Secondly, I would be remiss if I failed to acknowledge with gratitude and thanks the service rendered by the Common
<br />Council in the many preliminary meetings in the preparation of the budget and for this meeting this evening.
<br />However, before discussing the 1962 budget, I would like to visit with you as to some of my policies. .Having served,
<br />for eight years as the Clerk of St. Joseph County and further, as a Controller under two Mayors, it has been my firm
<br />conviction that strict and close attention to budgets must be made by governmental officials on a daily basis - -not just
<br />at tax hearing time. This I have done.
<br />There have been sizable economies throughout the entire city government as well as the water works and sewage treatment
<br />plant.
<br />I directed the water works board to eliminate the collection department which in itself amounts to savings at an
<br />annual rate of around $80,000.00. Further at my request, certain personnel cuts were effected which will reflect
<br />savings. The same procedure is being followed in the street department as to reduction of some personnel and
<br />attempting new methods and policies for effective organization.
<br />I have directed the Board of Public Works and Safety that competitive bidding shall extend itself to gasoline,.oils,
<br />heating materials and other supplies for our moving equipment. Already we can feel the savings in the purchse of all
<br />of these commodities.
<br />While we are intenseley concerned about watching our expenditures and making the tax dollar buy as many goods and as
<br />much service as possible, we still cannot afford to be shortsighted. In past years there have been instances where
<br />budget items were stricken out with no regard to the long range best interests of the City and to the detriment of
<br />the city's growth and progress. And, we have seen that these penny -wise vut pound - foolish actions often have resulted
<br />in a lagging behind by our city in areas vital to the expansion and development of our community.
<br />We certainly do not want to waste money. We must get full measure for every dollar. And yet, we also must keep in
<br />mind that we cannot allow our city to lag behind in areas essential to our future development.
<br />Therefore, I want to re- affirm my policy in the operation of our city government.
<br />We must, we will, and we are not providing the residents of our community with economical as well as efficient city
<br />government.
<br />Now, I would like to touch on several items in the budget if you will look at your budget review, starting on page
<br />three, you will note that we have trimmed the figures in the Mayor's Office, the City Controller, City Clerk, City
<br />Attorney and City Treasurer by a total of more than $14,000.00.
<br />On Page 15, you will find the largest single increase in budget request for any single department.... in the office of
<br />the Board of Works and Safety .... an increase of $131,000.00. I would like to go into this in a little detail....
<br />Most of this sum .... $118,000.00....is represented by a new item .... Fire Hydrant Rental. As you will remember, when
<br />the city applied for a water department rate increase for the purpose of improvement of our water system, we asked
<br />for 20 per cent. The Public Service Commission granted us an increase of only 10 per cent and ruled that the Civil
<br />City would be required to pay the Water Department $118,000.00 for rental of fire hydrants. However, in the last
<br />session of the Indiana State General Assembly I requested our local legislators to introduce legislation directing
<br />the water department to pay the city a total of $103,000.00 in lieu of taxes. This law was passed. You will find
<br />this listed as new additional revenue on page 53. So, actually, while we, are required to budget $118,000.00 for this
<br />item, we regain $103,000.00 of that in transfer of funds.
<br />Again on page 15, there is an increase of $6,000.00 in the budget for street lights and traffic signals. This is a
<br />good example of what is meant by keeping pace with our city's growth. Out city needs these additional facilities
<br />and, therefore, we must plan for them and we must pay for them.
<br />You also will note a new item for $6,500.00 under "other equipment ". This is for installation of underground gasolin
<br />tanks and results from our new policy of demanding competitive bids for all city purchases, including gasoline. Sinc
<br />we inaugurated the system of advertising for bids on gasoline, the former supplier understandably refused to provide
<br />these tanks as had been done before. However, I would like to point out that this outlay of $6,500.00 will be more
<br />than offset by money we save in the price of gasoline.
<br />On the next three pages, covering the sewer department, Morris Civic Auditorium and Engineering department.... you will
<br />find decreases of more than $10,000.00. This again reflects action by these departments on our suggestion that non-
<br />essential expenditures be eliminated or reduced to an absolute minimum.
<br />On Page 23 you will note an increase of about $5,000.00 for the Building Department. The bulk of this, more than
<br />$4,700.00, stems from the fact that we must have an additional inspector.... an assistant to the Director of sub - standa
<br />Buildings. Again here, we have stepped up our campaign to keep our city abreast of the times. Vigorous enforcement
<br />of the statute governing sub - standard homes has resulted in a tremendous increase in the work load of this department.
<br />I would also call to your attention that in the Building Department budget, as in many others, we have made a concete
<br />effort to offset some of the essential increases by cutting down on items such as office supplies, office furniture
<br />and fixtures, office equipment, stationery, and so forth. We find that with increased efficiency in our offices and
<br />closer scrutiny of day -to -day expenditures, we can effect these savings.
<br />Now, the next increase of any size comes in the police department.... on page 29....
<br />The bulk of the $11,645.00 additional budget is accounted for by an increase of $8,000.00 in longevity pay. As you
<br />know, the salary of policemen is fixed on a standard scale of increases with additional years of duty. I might note
<br />here that this system results in experienced policemen remaining on the force longer than might otherwise be the case
<br />and the city benefits from this valuable experience.
<br />
|