Laserfiche WebLink
COMMUNICATION <br />Frank J. Bruggner <br />Acting Mayor <br />Common Council <br />City of South Bend <br />South Bend, Indiana <br />Gentlemen: <br />usr LQr1DFa 14 , 170V <br />September 12, 1960 <br />I write this letter to inform the Common Council of South Bend that it will have the complete cooperation of my <br />office. I acknowledge that your Council is the legislative body of the City. It is my desire that we coordinate <br />our activities to continue the fine program that our beloved late Mayor Edward F. Voorde began and was able to <br />carry through until his untimely death. I want you to know that my office and my department heads will always <br />be available for consultation and information for your body at any and all times. It is my desire that we continue <br />to carry out Mr. Voorde's program. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />/s/ Frank J. Bruggner <br />Acting Mayor <br />Councilman Ladewski made a motion that the communication be accepted and placed on file. Councilman Muszynski s <br />ed the motion, Motion carried. <br />REPORT OF CONTROLLER FOR THE MONTH OF JULY, 1960 <br />Balance on Hand First of Month --------------------------------------------------------------------- $3,787,137.75 <br />Receiptsduring month ------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- - - - - -$ 501,431.90 <br />Disbursements during Month ------------------------------------------------------------------------- $1,043,747.54 <br />Balance on Hand July 31, 1960 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- $3,244,822.11 <br />REPORT OF CONTROLLER FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 1960 <br />Balance on Hand First of Month------------------------------------------- - - - - -- $3,244,822.11 <br />--------------- - - - -- <br />Receiptsduring Month ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ $1,074,643.39 <br />Disbursements during Month ------------------------------------------------------------------------- $1,047,543.26 <br />Balance on Hand August 31, 1960 -------------------------------------------------------------------- $3,271,922.24 <br />Councilman Muszynski made a motion that the reports of the Controller be accepted and placed on file. Councilman <br />Lehman seconded the motion. Motion carried. <br />REPORT OF PARK DEPARTMENT <br />Mr. Paul Krueper, Jr. <br />Councilman Drom Fourth District <br />South Bend, Indiana <br />Dear Councilman Krueper: <br />August 12, 1960 <br />This Department has been notified by the City Clerk's Office that you would like to have a report on the extent of <br />Dutch elm disease in South Bend and what is being done to curb it. <br />First I should like to refer you to Chapter 30 of the South Bend Code which is the ordinance coverning trees and <br />shrubs. This ordinance in substance places the responsibility for the planting, care, trrimming and removal of <br />trees upon the owner of such real estate. In case of emergency work on the trees or removals may be made by the <br />Park Department. We estimate such emergencies, caused by storms, cost to the Park Department from $5,000.00 to <br />$,10,000.00 per year. <br />I have been sending articles to the newspapers concerning Dutch elm disease since 1955 in order that our citizens <br />may be made aware of the situation. In 1956 we made a survey.of street treesein South Bend and found that there <br />were a total of 8,267 American Elms along our streets. At the same time a study in our parks revealed a total of <br />5,602 American Elm trees. We had only seven cases of Dutch elm disease in South Bend in 1955. Since then the <br />disease has spread rapidly. <br />In March, 1956, we requested all licensed arborists and nurserymen to attend a meeting at the Park Administration <br />Building. At this meeting we explained Dutch elm disease, showed a 20 minute film on the disease and furnished <br />all persons present with mimeographed directions for -formulations to be used in preventative spraying. We also <br />set up a reporting system and furnished all licensed arborists with mimeographed forms for such a report. Howe <br />with no State law or City ordinance to require observance the system failed because of apathy. <br />For your information I am enclosing some of the mimeographed material furnished to newspapers and arborists. <br />We requested and received an increase in our Park Budget funds to buy spray materials to be used on elms in our <br />Parks. However, in spite of our efforts we have presently, by count last week, a total of 104 American elms <br />which are dead or dying in the parks. These trees are being removed as rapidly as our small forestry department <br />can handle them. Probably all of the elms which will die this year are already dead or show positive indication, <br />of the disease. Many of the park dead elms have had a preventative spray. However, this spring was wet, cold and <br />windy and it was impossible for us to spray all of our park elm trees in the short period when weather was favorably <br />A check of permits to remove street trees made on August 11th reveals that 234 permits have been issued in 1960 up <br />to that time for the removal of dead or dying elm trees in the tree and lawn areas. We have no way of knowing how <br />many have been removed from rear and side yards. <br />A drive around South Bend will disclose perhaps one hundred or more dead or dying elm trees which have not been <br />removed at this time. We have approximately fifty calls per week to our office concerning street trees. Not- <br />withstanding all of the newspaper publicity on this matter a good share of our citizens believe that the cost of <br />operating a department for trimming and removal of street trees is included in their taxes. Of course this is not <br />true. If a street tree program were to be adopted this would cost an additional $100,000.00 or more per year. <br />This estimate is based on the cost of a similar department at Fort Wayne which is called "Tree Preservation" <br />and had a budget of $120,000.00 in 1960. <br />In conclusion, information concerning the feasibility of saving the elms by a costly preventative spray program <br />