Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JUNE 10, 1974 <br />OMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />RDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5, ANIMALS, <br />OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF <br />SOUTH BEND. <br />is being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />ponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Council President Nemeth made the presentation <br />r the ordinance. He explained that the ordinance was an amendment proposed to Chapter 5 of the <br />nicipal Code. He stated that there was a stray dog problem within the city and something must <br />done about it. He did not feel that there was a question the condition could be tolerated. He <br />elt there should be a good law to enforce. The basic section amended is Section 5 -16 which states <br />hat no person shall allow a dog to run loose. The ordinance provides for licensed and unlicensed <br />ogs in the event they are found running at large. If the dog is licensed, the city was to nofity <br />he owner and was to release the dog to its owner upon the payment of an impoundment fee. If the <br />og was not claimed within 10 days, the Humane Society would have custody or the animal would be <br />estroyed. If the dog is unlicensed, it was to be placed in the custody of the Humane Society or <br />estroyed. He proposed an amendment to adopt the present license tax of $2.00 and the impoundment <br />ee to be set at $10.00, as those items within the ordinance had been left blank. He briefly talked <br />bout arrangements to be made with the Humane Society regarding the keeping of stray animals. <br />ouncilman Kopczynski made a motion to <br />icense tax and the amount of $10.00 fo <br />aragraph (d) to Section 5 -16: "The ow <br />emoving the same in a proper container <br />hall not permit the same to deposit ex <br />otion. The motion carried. <br />amend the ordinance by inserting the amount of $2.00 for the <br />r the impoundment fee, and the addition of the following <br />ner is responsible to remove any excrement from his dog by <br />and disposing of it on his own property. The owner of a do <br />crement in public parks." Councilman Taylor seconded the <br />Mr. Maurice Cohen, 725 East Eckman Street, expressed support of the ordinance. He wondered if <br />$24,000 was paid to the Humane Society each year, and if the city would utilize its own vans to <br />pick up the stray animals. He stated that he had not received cooperation from the Humane Society <br />on a particular instance when he had reported a sick dog running at large. Council President Nemeth <br />stated that the Council would have to decide at the budget hearings if the $24,000 paid to the <br />Humane Society would be continued. He stated that if, rather than construct a dog pound, the city <br />hose to utilize the Humane Society, the city would have to pay some amount of money to the society <br />for use of its pound. Mr. Cohen felt the city should investigate the possibility of building its <br />own dog pound. Mr. Leo Wallisch, 446 LaPorte Avenue, stated that he appreciated Council President <br />emeth's comments. He indicated that he represented the union at the Post Office, and that the <br />esponsibility of the dogs remains with the owner, not society. He admitted that he loved dogs and <br />that he felt the owners should be punished for allowing their pets to run at large. He felt that, <br />since revenue sharing funds come from the taxpayers, they should be used to try and correct a city' <br />problems. He cited instances of postmen being bitten by dogs. He felt this was the responsibility <br />of the dog owners and the dogs should not be punished. Mr. Tom Dowell, Local Post Master, stated <br />that, in another city where he had worked, the dog ordinance was quite similar to the South Bend <br />proposal; however, the impoundment fees were much higher. He stated that mail cannot be delivered <br />to residents of a block if dogs are roaming at large and have bitten the postmen. He felt this was <br />also something to consider as it was a hardship on the residents. Mrs. Joseph Csiszar, Safety <br />Chairman for the Parent- Teacher Association Council, felt that, if the ordinance was passed, the <br />people would expect the administration to have enforcement of the ordinance and a program where the <br />citizens would not be shuffled from the Humane Society to the city and back again. She indicated <br />support of the ordinance if this could be accomplished. Dr. George Davis, a veterinarian at the <br />Ireland Animal Clinic, indicated that he was a spokesman for the veterinarians and stated that this <br />problem did not have an easy solution. He felt the key in all dog control programs that have worke <br />in various cities comes from a centrally located organization. He stated that dog wardens should b <br />sent out to pick up stray dogs. He stated that spay clinics are operating at a loss so this was no <br />the answer. Mr. Roman Kowalski, 802 Birchwood, wondered where the fees and fines would be deposited, <br />Council President Nemeth stated that the money would go into the General Fund. He stated that this <br />money would be appropriated for enforcement of the ordinance. Mr. Kowalski wondered, if the stray <br />dogs were picked up and taken to the dog pound, how much time would be given to the owner before <br />the animal was disposed of, and Council President Nemeth stated that the owner would have 10 days <br />to claim the animal. Ms. Martha Flanagan, President of the Humane Society of St. Joseph County, <br />stated that the stray dog situation was a big problem. She felt this was also the responsibility <br />of the owner. She indicated that the Humane Society would be willing to cooperate with the city in <br />any way possible. She stated that, at present, the Humane Society had two vans en route eight hour <br />a day throughout the county. She stated that the society was doing the best job possible with the <br />equipment and funds available to it. Mr. Ray Hernandez, 702 East South Street, asked about the rat <br />of capture of stray dogs that have not been reported and those dogs that are called about. Ms. <br />Flanagan cited one instance where the female animal catcher employed by the society brought in 18 <br />dogs in one evening. She stated that the society tried to answer all calls and that the amount of <br />pickup varied greatly from day to day depending on the weather, etc. Mr. Gene Evans, Executive <br />Secretary of the Civic Planning Association, wondered about the capacity for handling the dogs at t <br />Humane Society. Ms. Flanagan stated that about 200 animals could be handled comfortably at one tim <br />Paul Eitler, past manager of the Humane Society, stated that stray dogs were a problem; however <br />the Humane Society was not equipped to handle the job effectively and it was doing the best job <br />possible. Mrs. Rogers, secretary of the Humane Society, stated that, in the 1940's and 50's the <br />same problem existed in the community and the Mayor and every city official had been honest enough <br />to tell the society that the dog problem was one of the biggest headaches government was faced with <br />She stated that, at one time, the city had a very merciless dog pound and the Humane Society reliev <br />those merciless conditions. She indicated that the society was doing the best job possible with <br />the funds available. She felt there would be a duplication of services if the city utilized a pro- <br />gram of vans and dog catchers, and she reminded the Council that, if the city assumed such a progra <br />it would then become the "whipping boy" for the dog problem, not the Humane Society. Mr. Kowalski <br />felt the city should work on getting the owners to license the dogs and charge an adequate fee for <br />the license in order to support the program. He felt stray dogs that have no owners should be <br />destroyed. Council President Nemeth felt a close watch would have to be kept on the dollar figure <br />in case it was decided the fee was not high enough. Ms. Flanagan stated that it cost $133,000 to <br />run the Humane Society last year. Mrs. Irene K. Gammon, City Clerk, stated that, as a former <br />employee of the Assessor's Office, the employees went door -to -door in assessing personal property <br />and dog owners were charged $3.00 for unspayed females, $1.00 for spayed females and $1.00 for male <br />She stated that, in one year of going door -to -door, $7,000 was collected from dog owners. She <br />stated that not many tags would be sold if the people had to come down to the County -City Building <br />to license their pets. Mr. Walter Lantz, Deputy Controller, stated that only 350 tags have been <br />sold this year, and it was pointed out there were over 40,000 dogs within the community. <br />