REGULAR MEETING JUNE 10, 1974
<br />OMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED)
<br />RDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5, ANIMALS,
<br />OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF
<br />SOUTH BEND.
<br />is being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and
<br />ponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Council President Nemeth made the presentation
<br />r the ordinance. He explained that the ordinance was an amendment proposed to Chapter 5 of the
<br />nicipal Code. He stated that there was a stray dog problem within the city and something must
<br />done about it. He did not feel that there was a question the condition could be tolerated. He
<br />elt there should be a good law to enforce. The basic section amended is Section 5 -16 which states
<br />hat no person shall allow a dog to run loose. The ordinance provides for licensed and unlicensed
<br />ogs in the event they are found running at large. If the dog is licensed, the city was to nofity
<br />he owner and was to release the dog to its owner upon the payment of an impoundment fee. If the
<br />og was not claimed within 10 days, the Humane Society would have custody or the animal would be
<br />estroyed. If the dog is unlicensed, it was to be placed in the custody of the Humane Society or
<br />estroyed. He proposed an amendment to adopt the present license tax of $2.00 and the impoundment
<br />ee to be set at $10.00, as those items within the ordinance had been left blank. He briefly talked
<br />bout arrangements to be made with the Humane Society regarding the keeping of stray animals.
<br />ouncilman Kopczynski made a motion to
<br />icense tax and the amount of $10.00 fo
<br />aragraph (d) to Section 5 -16: "The ow
<br />emoving the same in a proper container
<br />hall not permit the same to deposit ex
<br />otion. The motion carried.
<br />amend the ordinance by inserting the amount of $2.00 for the
<br />r the impoundment fee, and the addition of the following
<br />ner is responsible to remove any excrement from his dog by
<br />and disposing of it on his own property. The owner of a do
<br />crement in public parks." Councilman Taylor seconded the
<br />Mr. Maurice Cohen, 725 East Eckman Street, expressed support of the ordinance. He wondered if
<br />$24,000 was paid to the Humane Society each year, and if the city would utilize its own vans to
<br />pick up the stray animals. He stated that he had not received cooperation from the Humane Society
<br />on a particular instance when he had reported a sick dog running at large. Council President Nemeth
<br />stated that the Council would have to decide at the budget hearings if the $24,000 paid to the
<br />Humane Society would be continued. He stated that if, rather than construct a dog pound, the city
<br />hose to utilize the Humane Society, the city would have to pay some amount of money to the society
<br />for use of its pound. Mr. Cohen felt the city should investigate the possibility of building its
<br />own dog pound. Mr. Leo Wallisch, 446 LaPorte Avenue, stated that he appreciated Council President
<br />emeth's comments. He indicated that he represented the union at the Post Office, and that the
<br />esponsibility of the dogs remains with the owner, not society. He admitted that he loved dogs and
<br />that he felt the owners should be punished for allowing their pets to run at large. He felt that,
<br />since revenue sharing funds come from the taxpayers, they should be used to try and correct a city'
<br />problems. He cited instances of postmen being bitten by dogs. He felt this was the responsibility
<br />of the dog owners and the dogs should not be punished. Mr. Tom Dowell, Local Post Master, stated
<br />that, in another city where he had worked, the dog ordinance was quite similar to the South Bend
<br />proposal; however, the impoundment fees were much higher. He stated that mail cannot be delivered
<br />to residents of a block if dogs are roaming at large and have bitten the postmen. He felt this was
<br />also something to consider as it was a hardship on the residents. Mrs. Joseph Csiszar, Safety
<br />Chairman for the Parent- Teacher Association Council, felt that, if the ordinance was passed, the
<br />people would expect the administration to have enforcement of the ordinance and a program where the
<br />citizens would not be shuffled from the Humane Society to the city and back again. She indicated
<br />support of the ordinance if this could be accomplished. Dr. George Davis, a veterinarian at the
<br />Ireland Animal Clinic, indicated that he was a spokesman for the veterinarians and stated that this
<br />problem did not have an easy solution. He felt the key in all dog control programs that have worke
<br />in various cities comes from a centrally located organization. He stated that dog wardens should b
<br />sent out to pick up stray dogs. He stated that spay clinics are operating at a loss so this was no
<br />the answer. Mr. Roman Kowalski, 802 Birchwood, wondered where the fees and fines would be deposited,
<br />Council President Nemeth stated that the money would go into the General Fund. He stated that this
<br />money would be appropriated for enforcement of the ordinance. Mr. Kowalski wondered, if the stray
<br />dogs were picked up and taken to the dog pound, how much time would be given to the owner before
<br />the animal was disposed of, and Council President Nemeth stated that the owner would have 10 days
<br />to claim the animal. Ms. Martha Flanagan, President of the Humane Society of St. Joseph County,
<br />stated that the stray dog situation was a big problem. She felt this was also the responsibility
<br />of the owner. She indicated that the Humane Society would be willing to cooperate with the city in
<br />any way possible. She stated that, at present, the Humane Society had two vans en route eight hour
<br />a day throughout the county. She stated that the society was doing the best job possible with the
<br />equipment and funds available to it. Mr. Ray Hernandez, 702 East South Street, asked about the rat
<br />of capture of stray dogs that have not been reported and those dogs that are called about. Ms.
<br />Flanagan cited one instance where the female animal catcher employed by the society brought in 18
<br />dogs in one evening. She stated that the society tried to answer all calls and that the amount of
<br />pickup varied greatly from day to day depending on the weather, etc. Mr. Gene Evans, Executive
<br />Secretary of the Civic Planning Association, wondered about the capacity for handling the dogs at t
<br />Humane Society. Ms. Flanagan stated that about 200 animals could be handled comfortably at one tim
<br />Paul Eitler, past manager of the Humane Society, stated that stray dogs were a problem; however
<br />the Humane Society was not equipped to handle the job effectively and it was doing the best job
<br />possible. Mrs. Rogers, secretary of the Humane Society, stated that, in the 1940's and 50's the
<br />same problem existed in the community and the Mayor and every city official had been honest enough
<br />to tell the society that the dog problem was one of the biggest headaches government was faced with
<br />She stated that, at one time, the city had a very merciless dog pound and the Humane Society reliev
<br />those merciless conditions. She indicated that the society was doing the best job possible with
<br />the funds available. She felt there would be a duplication of services if the city utilized a pro-
<br />gram of vans and dog catchers, and she reminded the Council that, if the city assumed such a progra
<br />it would then become the "whipping boy" for the dog problem, not the Humane Society. Mr. Kowalski
<br />felt the city should work on getting the owners to license the dogs and charge an adequate fee for
<br />the license in order to support the program. He felt stray dogs that have no owners should be
<br />destroyed. Council President Nemeth felt a close watch would have to be kept on the dollar figure
<br />in case it was decided the fee was not high enough. Ms. Flanagan stated that it cost $133,000 to
<br />run the Humane Society last year. Mrs. Irene K. Gammon, City Clerk, stated that, as a former
<br />employee of the Assessor's Office, the employees went door -to -door in assessing personal property
<br />and dog owners were charged $3.00 for unspayed females, $1.00 for spayed females and $1.00 for male
<br />She stated that, in one year of going door -to -door, $7,000 was collected from dog owners. She
<br />stated that not many tags would be sold if the people had to come down to the County -City Building
<br />to license their pets. Mr. Walter Lantz, Deputy Controller, stated that only 350 tags have been
<br />sold this year, and it was pointed out there were over 40,000 dogs within the community.
<br />
|