Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MRPTINQ APRIL 22, 1974 <br />IIREGULAR MEETING - RECONVENED (CONTINUED) <br />The Honorable Common Council April 17, 1974 <br />City of South Bend <br />County -City Building <br />South Bend, Indiana 46601 <br />In Re: A proposed ordinance initiated by the Area Plan Commission to zone from "D" <br />Light Industrial, "C" Height and Area, to "B" Residential, "A" Height and <br />Area, Lots 5 through 16, and Lots 37 through 48 of Kaley's 1st Subdivision. <br />This property is commonly described as being located on the north and south <br />sides of Linden Avenue from Meade Street to the north -south alley between <br />Fremont and Olive, City of South Bend. <br />Gentlemen: <br />The attached rezoning petition initiated by the Area Plan Commission was legally <br />advertised April 6, 1974, and April 13, 1974. The Area Plan Commission gave it a public <br />hearing on April 16, 1974, at which time the following action was taken: <br />"A motion by Robert Lehman was seconded by Joseph Simeri to favorably <br />recommend the ordinance initiated by the Area Plan.Commission to zone from <br />"D" Light Industrial, "C" Height and Area, to "B" Residential, "A" Height <br />and Area, Lots 5 through 16, and Lots 37 through 48 of Kaley's lst <br />Subdivision commonly described as being located on the north and south <br />sides of Linden Avenue from Meade Street to the north -south alley between <br />Fremont and Olive, City of South Bend. <br />The Area Plan Commission finds that the entire area should be rezoned to <br />residential in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of the Model Neighborhood <br />and the Land Use Plan of the City of South Bend. <br />Mr. Lehman's motion was then carried unanimously." <br />The deliberations of the Area Plan Commission and points considered in arriving <br />at the above decision are shown in the minutes of that public hearing and will be for- <br />warded to you at a later date to be made a part of this report. <br />Very truly yours, <br />s/ Richard S. Johnson <br />RSJ /ch Executive Director <br />cc: Hollis Hughes <br />I lCouncilman Newburn made a motion to set the ordinances referred to in the reports for public <br />hearing and second reading on May 13, 1974, seconded by Councilman Taylor. The motion carried. <br />IIREPORT FROM THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LAW <br />Mr. James Roemer, Director of the Department of Law, gave his quarterly report to the Council. He <br />indicated that he wished to speak on the procedure involved in the application of the industrial <br />development bonds. He presented a flow chart to the Council and referred to cartoon drawings. He <br />indicated that eight steps are involved, and they included the corporation's decision to locate or <br />expand in the community; the bank's financing of the industrial development bonds; the attorney's <br />preparation of all documents pertaining to the application for the bond; the approval needed by <br />the Industrial Development Commission; the approval of a resolution and ordinance by the Common <br />Council; the mayor's signing of the bond, trust indenture and lease agreement; the purchase by the <br />bank of the bond; and the benefits received by the corporation in the financing of the new plant o <br />addition at a lower net cost as a result of the bond. Mr. Roemer stated that one million dollars <br />was the maximum amount for the normal industrial development bond application, but a maximum of <br />five million dollars was allowed if specific requirements were met. He briefly explained the thre <br />documents involved: the bond, trust indenture and lease agreement and option to purchase. He con <br />cluded his presentation by indicating that, although the property was normally in the name of the <br />city, it was entered on the tax rolls and was fully taxable to the corporation for property tax <br />purposes, and the city in turn received property tax revenues from the new project. Council <br />President Nemeth thanked Mr. Roemer for his. presentation. <br />Councilman Kopczynski asked Mr. Roemer about the city's policy on paying claims to victims of <br />accidents or property damages caused by employees of the city. Mr. Roemer indicated that the city <br />carried personal injury insurance and a deductible of $1,000, and property damage insurance with <br />a deductible of $250. He stated that all claims were investigated by the insurance carrier, Etna <br />Insurance. He indicated that, if $5,000 was paid for personal injury, a form was submitted to the <br />Legal Department indicating expenses and reasons for allowing the claim. Councilman Kopczynski <br />wondered if this was done on the facts received from the insurance company or if the victim had to <br />sue the city to collect his damages. Mr. Roemer stated that the company might decide the claim <br />should be paid without litigation; however, in some instances, the claim might be questioned. He <br />indicated that this procedure was basically the same as a homeowner's policy or automobile insuranc <br />coverage. <br />IIORDINANCES, SECOND READING <br />IIORDINANCE NO. 5656 -74 <br />AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $37,500.00 <br />FROM THE FEDERAL ASSISTANCE GRANT <br />COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS GENERAL REVENUE <br />SHARING, FOR VARIOUS PUBLIC WORKS PRO- <br />GRAMS, TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE CITY <br />OF SOUTH BEND THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT <br />OF PUBLIC WORKS. <br />This ordinance had second reading. Councilman Serge made a motion that the ordinance pass, sec <br />by Councilman Taylor. The ordinance passed by a roll call vote of nine ayes (Councilmen Serge, <br />Szymkowiak, Miller, Parent, Taylor, Kopczynski, Horvath, Newburn and Nemeth). <br />