My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Traffic Control Device-TR24-106 William and Washington Removal & Installation
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Board of Works Documents
>
2025
>
Traffic Control Devices
>
Traffic Control Device-TR24-106 William and Washington Removal & Installation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2025 3:02:46 PM
Creation date
4/22/2025 3:02:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Projects
Document Date
4/22/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicular Volume <br />The 4-Hour Vehicular Volume signal warrant conditions are intended to be applied where <br />the volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic <br />control signal. This warrant is intended for use at locations that have very high peak hour <br />volumes, such as driveways at large factories or industrial developments, where traffic <br />peaks occur (and dissipate) over a short period. <br />For any four (4) hours of an average day, the traffic volumes on both the major street and <br />minor street approaches do not exceed the applicable thresholds under applicable <br />conditions. As a result, a traffic signal is not warranted based on the four-hour vehicular <br />volume (Warrant 2) criteria. <br />Warrant 3: Peak Hour <br />The Peak Hour signal warrant is intended for use at a location where traffic conditions are <br />such that for a minimum of one (1) hour of an average day, the minor-street traffic suffers <br />undue delay when entering or crossing the major street. Both conditions A (delay-based <br />warrants), and B (volume-thresholds) were evaluated. <br />During the peak hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods), the total stopped-time <br />delay on the minor street approach does not reach four (4) vehicle-hours for a one-lane <br />approach, nor does the volume on the minor street exceed 100 vehicles per hour. <br />Additionally, the total entering volume for the intersection remains below 800 vehicles per <br />hour, indicating the plotted point on Figure 4C-3 representing volume on the major street <br />and the corresponding volume on the minor street does not exceed its delimiting curve. <br />Therefore, a traffic signal is not warranted based on the Warrant 3 Peak Hour criteria. <br />Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume <br />The Pedestrian Volume signal warrant is intended for application where the traffic volume <br />on a major street is so heavy that pedestrians experience excessive delay in crossing the <br />major street. <br /> <br />The number of pedestrians crossing the major street and the vehicle volume do not <br />exceed the applicable thresholds for either the 4-hour period or the 1-hour period (any <br />four consecutive 15-minute periods) as defined in Figure 4C-5. Therefore, a traffic signal <br />is not warranted based on pedestrian volume warrant (Warrant 4). <br /> <br />Warrant 5: School Crossing <br />The School Crossing signal warrant is intended for application where the fact that school <br />children cross the major street is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control <br />signal.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.