Laserfiche WebLink
91 <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />MARCH 25, 1991 <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bill, proponents <br />and opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Council Member Puzzello <br />reported that the Personnel and Finance Committee had met on this bill and <br />recommended it to the Council favorable. Cynthia Love -Bush, Director of Human <br />Rights, made the presentation for the bill. She indicated this appropriation would <br />be used to defray the expenses of the Commission for the year beginning October 1, <br />1990. Council Member Niezgodski made a motion to recommend this bill to the Council <br />favorable, seconded by Council Member Coleman. The motion carried. <br />There being no further business to come before the Committee of the Whole, Council <br />Member Coleman made a motion to rise and report to the Council, seconded by Council <br />Member Zakrzewski. The motion carried. <br />ATTEST: ATTEST: <br />City Clerk airm n <br />REGULAR MEETING RECONVENED <br />Be it remembered that the Common Council of the City of South Bend reconvened in the <br />Council Chambers on the fourth floor of the County -City Building at 7:18 p.m. <br />Council President Niezgodski presiding and nine members present. <br />BILLS, THIRD READING <br />ORDINANCE NO. 8175 -91 AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $37,500.00 FROM THE U.S. EQUAL <br />EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION FOR THE PURPOSE OF <br />DEFRAYING THE EXPENSES OF THE SOUTH BEND HUMAN RIGHTS <br />COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA FOR THE YEAR <br />BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1990, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1991. <br />This bill had third reading. Council Member Coleman made a motion to pass this <br />bill, seconded by Council Member Duda. The bill passed by a roll call vote of nine <br />ayes. <br />RESOLUTION NO. 8152 -91 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH <br />BEND, INDIANA, APPROVING A PETITION OF THE SOUTH BEND BOARD <br />OF ZONING APPEALS 4 -H FAIRGROUNDS, PIONEER AUTOMOBILE <br />ASSOCIATION <br />WHEREAS, Indiana Code, 36 -7 -4 -918.6 requires the Common Council to give notice <br />pursuant to Indiana Code, 5- 14 -1.5 -5 of its intention to consider Petitions from the <br />Board of Zoning Appeals for approval or disapproval: and <br />WHEREAS, the Common Council has a period of thirty (30) days after the Board of <br />Zoning Appeals makes its recommendation to the Council, in which to take formal <br />action; and <br />WHEREAS, if it approves a Petition, the Common Council. must make the <br />determination in writing as required by Indiana Code, 36 -7 -4- 918.4; and <br />WHEREAS, the South Bend Board of Zoning Appeals has recommended favorably that <br />it grant an exception to allow a (State the proposed use of the property in <br />question) <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, <br />INDIANA, as follows: <br />Section I. The Common Council has provided notice of the hearing on the <br />Petition from the Board of Zoning Appeals pursuant to Indiana Code, 5- 14- 1.5 -5. <br />Section II. Following presentation by the Petitioner and proper public <br />hearing, the Common Council hereby approves the Petition of the South Bend Board of <br />Zoning Appeals, Appeal No. 3.581, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated <br />herein by reference, and marked for purposes of identification as Exhibit A. <br />Section III. The Common Council finds that: <br />(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals, and <br />general welfare of the community; <br />(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the <br />special exception will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner; <br />(3) The need for the special exception arises from some conditions peculiar to <br />the property involved; <br />(4) The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance will constitute <br />an unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the special exception <br />is sought; and <br />(5) The approval does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan <br />adopted by the City. <br />