My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-09-00 Council Meeting Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Common Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000
>
10-09-00 Council Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2013 3:52:30 PM
Creation date
4/18/2013 3:33:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Council Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
10/9/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 9, 2000 <br />physician at Memorial Hospital. After consultation, a call will go to the pilot of the helicopter <br />service. That pilot does not know the situation of the patient. He makes a decision to fly strictly <br />upon the conditions that exist thinking first of the safety of his staff. Once the decision is made, <br />within five (5) to seven (7) minutes that flight is off the ground and is responding. Once a patient <br />has been picked up they will be flown back to Memorial. The helipad itself will be located at the <br />northwest corner of the Lafayette parking garage. This project requires that they put an addition on <br />the parking garage and that they build the helistop on top of that garage. The helicopter will land, <br />the patient will be taken by stretcher immediately to the elevator bank and directly down into the <br />emergency trauma center. Every moment is critical and they believe this is the absolute best way <br />for patients to be taken into emergency services. Not only is it the best alternative but it is the only <br />viable alternative. He stated that the hospital is aware that noise is an issue. He noted that they have <br />committed to a Fly Neighborly Program which requires a height of flight during missions of an <br />excess of one thousand (1,000) feet. They will be flying over one thousand (1,000) feet and they <br />will be flying within certain mandated speeds and on flight patterns that try to avoid the most heavily <br />populated areas of the community. Mr. Neufelder showed the primary flight path on the diagram <br />which indicated that it is directly down Lafayette. The secondary flight paths will be used only when <br />necessary. Under no circumstances would they fly over the elementary school. They will be flying <br />at a level of seventy -five (75) decibels which is less than a City bus and less than a lawnmower and <br />far less than the alternative which is an ambulance with a siren which is one hundred five (105) <br />decibels. <br />Mr. Bob Snyder, Architect, BSA Design in Indianapolis, 9365 Counselors Road, Indianapolis, <br />Indiana, advised that over the last two (2) years they have evaluated a number of different sites after <br />having first established criteria. That criteria include safety for the community, hospital and patients; <br />access to the patients and the helicopter; the time to transfer the patients from the helicopter to the <br />trauma center; cost and budget; the proximity and location of the site to the trauma center; elevator <br />access and the size of the elevators; the FAA primary and secondary flight paths and the structural <br />and seismic loading for the different buildings that have been evaluated. The initial two (2) sites on <br />the ground which were north of the Bartlett Street garage and the site at the corner of Lafayette and <br />Bartlett Street were eliminated because of the logistics of transferring the patients from that location <br />after the helicopter landed to an ambulance would have to circulate around to the emergency room. <br />The third site which was evaluated was on top of the Bartlett Street garage which is designed from <br />a structural standpoint to accommodate one future floor. The concern with this location was the <br />proximity and route that the patient would have to travel through the entire hospital circulating back <br />to the emergency room. The time involved was not acceptable and the patient would have to travel <br />through public corridors for the majority of that route. A fourth site was on top of the 73 building, <br />which is the patient tower, was eliminated because of a significant number of communication towers <br />and mechanical units all of which would have to be relocated or removed. This building was not <br />designed to accommodate any future vertical expansion. The logistics of the elevators in the 73 <br />building was also an issue because while they are appropriately sized to accommodate the transfer <br />of patients, they are not appropriately sized to accommodate a trauma patient. This site was <br />eliminated for these reasons. The next site identified was the Centennial Building and while that was <br />the recommendation on the initial report it was done at a point in time when after evaluating all the <br />sites this was the first choice. At that time the hospital gave a directive to their structural engineers <br />to pull the set of construction documents for this building, analyze and evaluate it and see if it could <br />in fact accommodate the heliport on the roof or anywhere in the upper portion of this building. After <br />it was evaluated, it was determined that the building was not designed for a future vertical expansion. <br />The building can be modified but the logistics of making that happen were insurmountable. There <br />are a number of physicians in this building and the lower level of this building is occupied by <br />outpatient surgery. All these services and the physicians would be disrupted. The physicians have <br />a contract lease with the hospital and to modify the building, it would have to be closed for a <br />minimum of six (6) to nine (9) months to excavate down through the building to the bottom of the <br />footings and underpin and rework the footings to accommodate the future load and reinforce and <br />stabilize four primary columns all the way up through the building. The physical costs of this site <br />just for modifications to the building would be in excess of ten million dollars ($10,000,000.00) <br />which is not an appropriate location to be evaluated. <br />Mr. Snyder noted that at that time based on further studies working with Mr. Ambers they had <br />selected the center site for the Lafayette Street parking garage because of its immediate proximity <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.