Laserfiche WebLink
STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Page 2 of 7 <br />Between City of South Bend and ARCADIS U.S., Inc. Project Number: 30029091 <br />AMENDMENT No. 2 <br />119-069 WWTP Secondary and Disinfection Improvements Amendment No. 2 <br />Schedule A-1 <br />Scope of Amended Services and Related Matters <br />ENGINEERING SERVICES BY ARCADIS <br />WWTP Hydraulic Improvements. The City of South Bend desires to continue its efforts to rehabilitate, modify and <br />expand the WWTP to work towards achieving the CSO Long-Term Control Plan requirement, which requires an increase <br />in the peak wet weather capacity from 77 MGD to 100 MGD. <br />The South Bend WWTP is a Class IV activated sludge treatment facility required to provide preliminary treatment, primary <br />and secondary treatment, phosphorous removal, and disinfection throughout all seasons. The NPDES permit lists a rated <br />average flow of 48 MGD and a rated peak flow of 77 MGD. The plant’s current average flow is approximately 36 MGD <br />and it can treat a peak flow up to 77 MGD. Liquid treatment processes include screening, grit removal, raw sewage <br />pumping, primary treatment, activated sludge, final clarifiers, and chlorination / dechlorination. Sludge treatment <br />processes include gravity thickening of primary sludge, dissolved air floatation thickening of waste activated sludge, two- <br />stage anaerobic digestion, and belt filter press dewatering. Class B biosolids are reused by land application on farmland. <br />As part of Arcadis’ prior planning projects, a hydraulic model was created for the plant and used to model different flow <br />conditions through each process at the plant to achieve the plant’s future 100 MGD peak flow requirement as part of the <br />CSO Long-Term Control Plan. The hydraulic model was calibrated using recorded plant flows and water surface <br />elevations around the plant. Limiting hydraulic elements, also called bottlenecks, were identified and analyzed further <br />under peak flow and other hydraulic conditions. The City has addressed all bottlenecks except two major areas require <br />hydraulic improvements at the WWTP to achieve the future 100 MGD flow: (1) Primary Effluent and (2) Final Clarifier Nos. <br />6 and 7 Influent, as further described below. In addition, there are abandoned structures within these areas that may be <br />demolished. <br />Primary Effluent Hydraulic Improvements. The preliminary and primary treatment process consists of the headworks <br />facility (screening, grit removal), raw sewage pumping and the primary clarifiers. After the plant flow leaves the <br />headworks, the raw sewage pumps (located in the Compressor Building) pump flow into the primary influent channel <br />which discharges into eight primary clarifiers. The flow from each individual primary clarifier goes into a common primary <br />effluent conduit and the common primary effluent conduit is a hydraulic bottleneck. <br />The primary clarifier effluent conduit restricts flow leaving the primary clarifiers such that at flows equal to or greater than <br />approximately 65 MGD, the primary clarifier effluent flumes are submerged. At 100 MGD flow, the model predicts that this <br />bottleneck results in no freeboard in the primary clarifiers. Modifying the effluent conduit and primary clarifier effluent <br />Parshall flumes would alleviate this bottleneck. The abandoned in place 48-inch primary effluent meter has also been <br />identified as a hydraulic bottleneck in the primary effluent piping. <br />The following is proposed to alleviate the primary effluent bottleneck. A new open channel located parallel to the existing <br />primary effluent conduit along Primary Clarifier Nos. 1 through 4 only, north of the Primary Scum Building, and utilizing the <br />abandoned east-west bypass channel located above the primary effluent conduit is recommended. The new channel and <br />the existing conduit will flow into the existing east-west conduit and into the re-utilized abandoned bypass channel. Flow <br />from the bypass channel will flow into the primary effluent structure, similar to the existing primary effluent conduit, by <br />removing the bypass channel gates and demolishing a portion of the primary effluent structure wall. With all primary <br />clarifiers in service (with a return sludge flow of 72 MGD and all other tanks in service), these improvements will un- <br />submerge the weirs up to 80 MGD and the flumes up to 100 MGD and provide approximately 12-inches of freeboard in <br />the primary clarifiers up to 100 MGD. The abandoned in place 48-inch primary effluent meter and 48”x72” reducers will be <br />replaced with 72-inch pipe. <br />Final Clarifier Nos. 6 and 7 Influent Hydraulic Improvements. The Final Clarifier Nos. 6 and 7 influent pipe was <br />identified as another plant hydraulic bottleneck. The 60-inch pipe located between the south end of the Final Clarifier <br />Influent Channel and Junction Box NT1 that feeds Final Clarifier Nos. 6 and 7 is the source of the hydraulic bottleneck <br />under peak flow conditions. At the current peak capacity of 77 MGD and at the FEMA 100-year flood elevation, the 60- <br />inch pipe has inadequate flow capacity and can cause flow overtopping upstream within the plant. This pipe segment has <br />been modeled to show inadequate capacity at the future peak flow of 100 MGD under normal river conditions. <br />Replacing the existing 60-inch pipe with a larger size pipe would alleviate this hydraulic bottleneck. As part of the prior <br />planning, upsizing the existing 60-inch pipe in the segment indicated above to 84-inch pipe is recommended. However, <br />another alternative for consideration is instead to provide a new channel from the south end of the Final Clarifier Influent <br />Channel to Junction Box NT1 or potentially to Junction Box NT. This would require channel mixing. The benefits include