Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />“Page content is subject to Confidentiality Restrictions” <br /> <br />City of Arvada, Colorado | Project #37213 | M&V Report – Year 2 | Page 20 <br /> <br /> <br />City of Arvada, Colorado <br />The net result of the as-built changes and wattage measurements is additional savings for this ECM, since the kWh <br />difference between the existing and new as-built fixtures with measurements is greater than the kWh difference <br />between the existing and new fixtures from the original scope. This is shown in the table below. <br /> <br />Note: This analysis of the savings associated with just those fixture types being measured is provided as a proxy for the <br />overall savings for this ECM. Also included in the overall savings numbers shown at the top of Page 18 are any as -built <br />changes for fixture types that were not measured, kW demand savings for the entire s cope, and the natural gas <br />heating penalty (therms) for the entire scope. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Total kWh Consumption and Savings Associated with Measured <br />Fixture Types <br /> <br />Existing Fixtures New Fixtures Difference <br />kWh with Rated Watts <br />(Original Scope) 452,256 293,518 158,738 <br />kWh with Rated Watts <br />(As-Built Scope) 542,847 336,672 206,174 <br />kWh with Measured <br />Watts (As-Built Scope) 502,308 304,679 197,629 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />