Laserfiche WebLink
Personnel and Finance Committee <br /> September 6, 2000 <br /> Page 4 <br /> this for City-owned lots. It was noted that the minimum charge to clean a lot is $ 116 plus <br /> administration expenses. Ms. Davis noted that Larry Magliozzi is currently working on a program <br /> to divest the City of as many city lots as possible which total around 300. Ms. Davis stated <br /> that she would keep the Council updated on further updates on the city-owned <br /> lots. The Council Attorney and Dr. Varner voiced concern about the former fire station on <br /> Lincoln Way East (south side) with regard to weeds. Ms. Davis stated she would follow <br /> up on the former Lincoln Way East fire station property being cut on a regular <br /> basis, noting that she believed it was under the control of the Park Department. <br /> In response to a question from Dr. Varner, it was noted that the Hearing Officer is required <br /> to order an individual clean-up each time and that a new citation must be issued each time and a <br /> new file and new letters sent on the same property. Trash, garage and grass all go to the Hearing <br /> Officer. There is a 75%compliance rate as a result of letters being sent. <br /> Dr. Varner inquired about the property located at York and Byron which is <br /> in the hands of a mortgage company. Ms. Davis noted that most companies are <br /> non-responsive to requests for maintaining the property, noting that more and <br /> more properties are controlled by out-of-state companies who obtain them through <br /> tax sales. Dr. Varner suggested that further discussion on this topic take place. <br /> Dr. Varner inquired about the lien status of lots cleaned by the City. Ms. Dempsey stated <br /> that John Lentz has informed her that the County's computers are not capable of placing charges <br /> for lawn mowing/cleanup on the tax bills. The Committee requested an update on this topic. <br /> Ms. Dempsey noted that the City utilizes Small Claims Court and a collection agency to <br /> pursue collection for charges provided by the City. She then provided a one-page handout on <br /> collections(copy attached). <br /> WEIGHTS & MEASURES (FUND # 101-1202): <br /> 2000 Total Projected Expenditure: $40,796 2001 Total Projected Expenditure: $46.167 <br /> 2.5 % Increase <br /> Ms. Davis noted that approximately five (5) years ago the city and county weights and <br /> measures operations were consolidated. There is now a contractual agreement in place and the city <br /> receives payment once per year. Mishawaka has been asked to join but has declined. Ms. Davis <br /> noted that state law would need to be changed in order for fees to be charged for these services. <br /> CODE HEARING OFFICER (FUND # 101-1203): <br /> 2000 Total Projected Expenditure: $50,896 2001 Total Projected Expenditure: $52,677 <br /> 3.5%Increase <br /> Ms. Davis noted that this operation is now done on a contractual basis. It was changed in <br /> 1999 when it was determined that the Code Hearing Officer who had been receiving all City-paid <br /> benefits for several years was not entitled to such benefits. Council Member Aranowski noted that <br /> IRS rulings have gotten more stringent in this area recently. <br />