Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 22, 2013 14 <br />APPROVAL IGNITION ARK PH ADVERTISE EBM AS GRADING I— PROJECT T NO 112 -072 <br />(AEDA TIFF <br />In a memorandum to the Board, Mr. Patrick Henthom, Engineering, requested permission to <br />advertise for the receipt of bids for the above referenced project. Also presented at this time for <br />approval and execution was the Title Sheet. Upon a motion made by Mr. Gilot, seconded by Mr. <br />Neal and carried, the above request to advertise was approved, and the Title Sheet was approved <br />and signed. <br />APPROV AL ADVERTISE C AND—TITLE <br />SEWER SEPARATION PHASE 4 -- PRO ET NO 112 041 2012 <br />SHEET AST BANK <br />SEWER BOND <br />In a memorandum to the Board, Mr. Patrick Henthorn, Engineering, requested permission to <br />advertise for the receipt of bids for the above referenced project. Also presented at this time for <br />approval and execution was the Title Sheet. Upon a motion made by Mr. Inks, seconded by Mr. <br />Neal and carried, the above request to advertise was approved, and the Title Sheet was approved <br />and signed. <br />SHEEOVALDOOND AVENUE PHASE T3 SEW THE RECEIPT DNO TITLE 109- <br />0338 2012 SEWER BOND <br />In a memorandum to the Board, Mr. Patrick Henthom, Engineering, requested permission to <br />advertise for the receipt of bids for the above referenced project. Also presented at this time for <br />approval and execution was the Title Sheet. Upon a motion made by Mr. Gilot, seconded by Mr. <br />Neal and carried, the above request to advertise was approved, and the Title Sheet was approved <br />and signed. <br />APPROVAL OF REQUEST TO ADVERTISE FOR THE RECEIPT OF BIDS AND TITLE <br />SHEET — CENTURY CENTER LIGHTING RENOVATIONS REBID — PROJECT NO. 112- <br />03 3 (HOTEL/MOTEL AND CENTURY CENTER) <br />In a memorandum to the Board, Mr. Jonathon Burke, Energy Depart ment, requested permission <br />to advertise for the receipt of bids for the above referenced project. Also presented at this time <br />for approval and execution was the Title Sheet, Mr. Neal questioned Mr. Burke if he is confident <br />there will be a lot of competitive bids for this project now that it has been redone. Mr. Burke <br />stated he is; they took a lot of the unknowns and the risks out of the contract. They also reduced <br />the alternates from twenty -seven (27) to five (5) which allows the contractors more time to <br />complete their work. Ms. Greene stated she received calls from potential bidders and one of the <br />issues they had was the lack of control on their part over the time it would take to stage, un- <br />stage, and wait for the decision making. She noted they said this would take time away from <br />them to complete the project, and would work against them. Mr. Burke stated the Great Hall was <br />removed from the project because it was found to be too cost prohibitive to do a staging of <br />possible replacement fixtures by removing all the panels, replacing the lights, have a review <br />done, and repeat the process. He noted the Great Hall will be done separately at a later date. <br />Upon a motion made by Mr. Inks, seconded by Mr. Neal and carried, the above request to <br />advertise was approved, and the Title Sheet was approved and signed. <br />TABLE RESOLUTION NO. 01 -2013 — A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF PUBLIC <br />WORKS OF SOUTH BEND INDIANA TO SET THE WAGE RATES FOR THE YEAR 2013 <br />FOR PROJECTS COSTING LESS THAN $250 000 <br />Ms. Greene explained that this resolution is adopted by the Board of Works every year to set <br />common construction wage rates for projects under the State adopted threshold of construction <br />projects. She added that this year that threshold is $250,000.00, so the City adopts their own <br />policy for wage rates for all projects under this amount. She noted all of the City projects are <br />bound by the wage rates, and stated the downside is that you escalate the cost of the product and <br />make it difficult for minority and small contractors to bid on projects. Mr. Gilot questioned if for <br />smaller projects the City should look at other policies and re- wording the resolution. He <br />suggested the Resolution be tabled until he could review the policy with the Mayor's office. <br />Upon a motion made by Mr. Inks, seconded by Mr. Neal and carried, the Resolution was tabled <br />by the Board of Public Works. <br />