My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
MCSWEENEY APPEAL BRIEF submitted 62522
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Upcoming Bills
>
2022
>
07-11-2022
>
McSweeney Appeal Brief & Exhibits
>
MCSWEENEY APPEAL BRIEF submitted 62522
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2022 3:23:03 PM
Creation date
7/7/2022 2:07:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2) HISTORICAL PRESERVATION <br />The Standards and Guidelines of the Chapin Park Historic District [Exhibit C] provides the <br />following definition of Preservation: <br />PRESERVATION [...]can include stabilization work, restoration or rehabilitation work, <br />ongoing maintenance and/or prevention of demolition. [69]. <br />This document moreover includes this sentence: "Original windows and doors shall be retained [... ] <br />When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original." <br />[79]. <br />Greentree Environmental Inc, a well-regarded environmental services firm that regularly <br />contracts with the City of South Bend, has attested via an email shared with the HPC that these <br />six windows have deteriorated beyond repair and must be replaced [Exhibit D]. <br />Moreover, we conferred with and took the advice of HPC liaison Adam Toering, revising our <br />proposal to reflect a material previously approved by the HPC, namely wood -clad aluminum [see <br />Exhibit E]. Further, we have confirmed and orally communicated to the committee that the <br />materials will be an appropriate color and grid patterns resembling the original. <br />Given that we have clearly met the Guideline's expectations that the windows have deteriorated <br />beyond repair and that the replacements will resemble the original, the denial by HPC is <br />undeniably arbitrary and capricious and without defensible foundation. <br />FACTS <br />The most important fact that you will read in this document is the following: <br />On October 7, 2021, following hospitalization for respiratory distress, our then -two-year-old <br />child Othello was found to have an elevated Lead Blood level of 7.0 ug/DL. [Exhibit F] <br />The CDC held at that time that any blood level over 5ug/DL risks "adverse health effects, <br />particularly in children under 6 years of age." [Exhibit F, p. 2]. The CDC has since tightened the <br />standard and now holds adverse risks apply to any blood level over 3.5ug/DL. The CDC holds <br />that when a child screens with lead levels above the threshold, steps must be taken to investigate <br />the source of lead and take steps to reduce exposure to lead. [Exhibit G] <br />Othello's elevated screening results were shared by law with the St Joseph County Board of <br />Health, which in turn mandated a county lead investigation. Briannah Johnson conducted this <br />inspection on 10/13/21. Elevated lead was found throughout the home and property. [Exhibit H] <br />Six windows in particular were held to have extremely elevated lead levels, well beyond the <br />others in the house. I have isolated that portion of the report [Exhibit I] as these are the windows <br />under discussion in our initial petition for a Certificate of Apropriateness (COA), HPC's denial, <br />and our appeal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.