My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
MCSWEENEY APPEAL BRIEF submitted 62522
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Upcoming Bills
>
2022
>
07-11-2022
>
McSweeney Appeal Brief & Exhibits
>
MCSWEENEY APPEAL BRIEF submitted 62522
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2022 3:23:03 PM
Creation date
7/7/2022 2:07:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Filed in Clerk's Office <br />Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) v. Joyelle McSweeney, PetitidAoy�-J - <br />Cff)'GLEAIK, SOUTH BEND, IN <br />Petitioner's Evidentiary and Administrative Record, Pleading and Position Statement <br />June 23, 2022 <br />Submitted by Joyelle McSweeney <br />INTRODUCTION <br />On May 4, 2022, Joyelle McSweeney filed in the South Bend City Clerk's Office an Appeal to <br />the South Bend Common Council of the Historic Preservation Commission's Denial of <br />Certificate of Appropriateness. <br />The Appeal Application and Appeal Narrative [Exhibits A, B] give a chronological outline of the <br />events leading up to the filing, and I refer the Council to those documents for the relevant <br />specifics, which are also listed below in 'FACTS.' <br />STANDARD OF REVIEW <br />We ask that the common council apply a standard of review based on 1) reasonableness 2) health <br />and safety 3) preservation of historic value. <br />ISSUES OF LAW <br />1) REASONABLENESS and HEALTH AND SAFETY <br />The Standards and Guidelines of the Chapin Park Historic District [Exhibit C] provides the <br />following guidelines which the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) shall follow when <br />petitioned by a homeowner to provide a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA): <br />In making its determination, the Historic Preservation Commission shall consider three factors: <br />first, appropriateness of the proposed work to the preservation of the building and district; second, <br />the detriment to the public welfare if the proposed work is permitted even though it is not deemed <br />appropriate; third, the potential hardship that the denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness <br />would cause the applicant. [86] <br />We hold that by delaying and finally blocking the petitioner's ability to appropriately address the <br />most severely deteriorating, lead -shedding windows in our home, the HPC has caused <br />undeniable, severe and ongoing hardship to our three-year-old child and to us as a family. It has <br />therefore failed to meet the requirement of its own guidelines to consider potential hardship in <br />reaching its decisions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.