Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF SOUTH BEND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION <br />Sandra Kennedy, 227 W Jefferson Blvd. Suite 1200 South Bend, IN 46601 <br />The public was represented by: <br />Randy James, 125 S Lafayette Blvd. South Bend, IN 46601 <br />Charity Stowe, 614 S. St. Joseph St. South Bend, IN 46601 <br />After due consideration, the following action was taken: <br />Upon a motion by Mary Brazinsky, seconded by David Wyncott, and unanimously carried <br />by vote, the Historic Preservation Commission APPROVES Certificate of <br />Appropriateness Application #2022-0404. <br />Vote: 4-4. Four in Favor, four opposed. <br />COA#2022-0404 is denied due to lack of majority. <br />Commission President Gelfman clarified that, when certificates of appropriateness are not <br />approved, Commissioners are required to state their reasons for denial. Roll was called. <br />Commissioner Hertel (NAY): I vote against demolition for the reasons that have already <br />been stated, and I just want to restate Eric's concerns about demolition and the landfill, the <br />fact that we do not know what the inside looks like. I recognize that there is a potential that if <br />people are inside or living inside the dangers to that. I am confused as to why the City would <br />possibly pay a million dollars to demolish a building and not feel the need to invest that into <br />rehabbing a building that is a part of our community and offers so much character to our <br />community. It breaks my heart. I honestly came into this meeting anticipating that I would <br />approve this, and my ideas have been changed because this is an important part of our <br />history, and we can't afford to lose any more buildings. We don't need any more farmland in <br />the City of South Bend. <br />Commissioner Brazinsky (AYE): <br />Commissioner Andrews (AYE): <br />Commissioner Stalheim (NAY): For the reasons listed I totally agree, and I believe that we <br />don't know enough. I want to emphasize that point about the interior integrity in the main part <br />of the building, not the single story, the main part. The iconic part, it's the first thing you see <br />when you come into town from the airport. It is an important building; we need to do better. <br />And this is that point. Also, we should not be demolishing buildings, we are in the climate <br />change era now, right. The greenest building is a building that's already built. We need to <br />take care of this stuff. <br />Commissioner Downs-Krostenko (NAY): I also voted against demolition at this time <br />because I don't think that we can make that decision without more information and because I <br />want to draw a line in the sand and say what we all know is true. Which is that even if this <br />building does eventually come down, this should be our rubicon. Like we just need to stop, <br />and somebody needs to reconsider the way we are doing everything. And so, if this is the <br />one that goes, helps start that conversation seriously and helps the City actually put <br />resources towards it so for instance if we are going to have a commission committee that <br />addresses this on the statewide level, and lets face it, it is a property values issue it is <br />probably going to go higher than that. There are lots of tendrils to be considered the city <br />needs to give us city employee time. We need Christina or Sandi; we need someone that's <br />Page 12 <br />