10-10-88 Zoning & Vacation - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

&tnmmtttn smart ZONING AND VACATION COMMITTEE Ms tilt emu= t omuti of tdlr CV of lira: The October 10,' 1988 meeting of the Zoning and Vacation Committee was called to order by its Chairman Councilmen Lee . Slavinskas at 3 :40 p.m. in the Council informal meeting room. Persons in attendance included Councilmen:. Zakrzewski, Luecke, Puzzello, Slavinskas, Coleman, and Duda; Doug Carpenter, citizen member, Attorney Joseph Amaral, Ann Mannix, Steve Henry, Dick Maginot, James Wensits, Mike Danch, Dave Behr, and Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand. The first item on the agenda to be reviewed was Bill No. 41- 88 which would rezone the property located at the southeast corner of Jackson and Ironwood roads. Mr. Mike Danch of Peirce &. Associates stated that the area will have 389 single family lots. The development would abut the Stonehedge subdivision. All of the drainage requirements would be met to City limits. There would be 4 entrances namely two on Ironwood Road and two on Jackson Road. The name of the subdivision would be Greystone Manor subdivision. The petitioner for the rezoning is "Relative Real Estate Management, Inc. " out of Bristol, Connecticut. Mr. Frederick R. Hains is the attorney for the petitioner. Mr. Danch noted that the lots would be over 7, 000 square feet and the homes to be built would range in price from $65, 000. 00 to $100,000. 00 plus. He further noted that the area in. question was annexed into the City on September 15, 1988. The committee then reviewed a preliminary site development plan of the proposed subdivision. Following favorable comments, Councilman Steve Luecke made a motion seconded by Councilman Coleman that Bill No. 41-88 be recommended favorably to Council. The motion passed. Council Member. Ann Puzzello then reviewed Bill No. 105-87 which would amend the zoning for a portion of the northeast neighborhood. It was noted that a substitute bill would be considered. Council Member Puzzello stated that the original bill was before the Area Plan Commission approximately one year ago and received considerable remonstrance. The area in question now is considerably smaller and received a favorable recommendation from the Area Plan Commission at its meeting of September 20, 1988.