Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning & Vacation Minutes <br /> June 8, 1987 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Mr. Morgan also indicated that representatives would be <br /> present at the hearing from both Chicago and St. Louis and <br /> representing Venture Stores from the May Company Division. <br /> He stated that concern over lighting has been addressed and <br /> that the lights would be shielded from the residential area. <br /> With regard to the traffic on Widener Lane, he indicated that the <br /> proposed shopping center would have less of an impact than the <br /> relocation of Riley High School . <br /> He also stated that eight (8) homes on Widener Lane would be <br /> affected . He then showed a cross section indicating the <br /> elevation and proposed screening in the area. He stated that the <br /> natural difference in elevation ranges from 24' to 16' along the <br /> area and that 6'-8' fences would also be installed. He stated <br /> that draining would go into the rebuilt retention basin and that <br /> the developers would do all things reasonably necessary to <br /> minimize the impact to the area . He stated that a total <br /> investment of $9 million would be made into the development with <br /> between 300-350 jobs created . <br /> Mr. Morgan then introduced Mr. Mike Duggan of St. Louis who <br /> is the manager of architectural services , Mr. Dave La Pay from <br /> St. Louis who is a vice president for May Company, Mr. Chris <br /> Davey, Mr. Gordon Johnson, and Mr . Bob Dunbar . <br /> Councilman Robert Taylor then briefly referred to the <br /> traffic concerns raised by the residents of that area as well as <br /> his desire to have these needs addressed through the City <br /> Engineering Office and the residential neighborhood committee <br /> headed by Councilman Zakrzewski. He also indicated that the <br /> letter from the City Engineer showed the willingness of the City <br /> to sit down with the residents of the area to address the traffic <br /> concerns . <br /> Mr. John Abraham, a resident on Widener Lane, stated that he <br /> needed more time to address the various concerns. He believes <br /> that the project is too large for the area. He stated that he is <br /> not against progress but believes that certain concerns must be <br /> addressed . <br /> Betty Maroney , a resident of Widener Lane , disagreed with <br /> the elevation problem. She also stated that there is currently a <br /> water problem in the area. She believes that the streets <br /> (especially Widener Lane) are currently abused and that this must <br /> be addressed . <br />