Laserfiche WebLink
Safe Routes to School | 7 <br />Utility Coordination <br />Utility Coordination is an important <br />aspect of all projects, and we believe <br />it is a critical component of design <br />to maintain schedule, even on <br />curb ramp and sidewalk projects. <br />Our experience and preliminary <br />observation of the project area <br />indicates that utility conflicts will <br />likely be present. It is anticipated <br />that a majority of these conflicts can <br />be avoided through detailed and <br />creative design. We are prepared to <br />take a proactive approach to avoid <br />delays and issues during construction. <br />Utility coordination activities will <br />include: <br />• Initial notice to utilities and <br />verification of facilities <br />• Periodic status and plan updates <br />of the project to keep utilities <br />informed <br />• Correspondence and meetings <br />with utilities to discuss potential <br />conflicts and resolutions, if <br />necessary. <br />• Obtaining utility work plans, <br />including relocation plans, when <br />necessary. <br />Utilities along W. Dubail Street between <br />Scott Street and Kendall Avenue <br />Environmental Documentation <br />The use of federal funding triggers compliance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation <br />requirements. DLZ has conducted a field visit and preliminary reviews of GIS data available on the IndianaMap website, <br />the IDEM VFC, IDNR’s Indiana Buildings, Bridges, and Cemeteries Map website and other information to identify <br />potential “red flag” resources or issues that may need to be considered during design. Resources/issues noted in and <br />near the project area include public parks, schools, an abandoned railroad and hazardous materials sites. Designs that <br />minimize impacts to such resources and issues will be developed. The identified features are not anticipated to impede <br />project development. <br />The project will also require compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, which sets forth <br />a review process for identifying historic properties (including archaeological sites) and assessing potential effects. <br />The project proposes work types which receive Section 106 approval under the MPPA. The services of Qualified <br />Professional cultural subconsultants would be required if the project were to impact historic character-defining features <br />or impact previously undisturbed soils. <br />A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) may be appropriate for this project as no new right of way or <br />environmental permits are expected to be required. If less than 0.5 acre of new right of way is to be acquired, a Level <br />1 Categorical Exclusion (CE) would be required. A Level 2 CE) would be required if more than 0.5 acre of new right of <br />way is to be acquired. Section 4(f) involvement with a public park would require preparation of a Level 4 CE. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL <br />CHALLENGES SOLUTIONS <br />Section 106 <br />The project proposes work types which receive Section 106 approval under the Minor <br />Projects Programmatic Agreement (MPPA). MPPA applicability will expedite completion <br />of the NEPA documentation. <br />Section 4(f) <br />Section 4(f) properties, including public parks and historic properties, were noted in <br />the project area. Given that the project is not expected to require new right of way, no <br />impacts are anticipated at this time. If it is determined that right of way is required, the <br />project intent will be to limit any impacts such that De minimis impact criteria are met. A <br />De Minimis finding(s) will expedite completion of the NEPA documentation. <br />Stream and Water <br />Quality Impacts <br />Implementation of INDOT Standard Specifications is anticipated to adequately address <br />water quality concerns. Impacts requiring mitigation are not anticipated. <br />Wetlands <br />No NWI-mapped wetlands were noted near the project area; however, roadside ditches <br />may be determined to be jurisdictional features. A Waters of the U.S. Report will be <br />prepared to document the presence of wetlands. Impacts requiring mitigation are not <br />anticipated. <br />Floodplains/ <br />Floodways <br />No floodplain areas were noted within the project area. No negative floodplain impacts <br />are anticipated. <br />Threatened and <br />Endangered <br />Species <br />DLZ will conduct programmatic consultation for bat species of concern using the on- <br />line USFWS IPaC system, which streamlines the consultation process. “No Effect” <br />determinations, or “May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect” determinations are <br />anticipated. If trees are removed/trimmed, a seasonal tree clearing restriction is expected <br />(trees may not be removed from April 1 through September 30). <br />Hazardous <br />Materials Sites <br />Hazardous materials sites were noted within the project area. Given the minor nature of <br />sidewalk construction activities, no impacts are anticipated.