07-14-08 Council Meeting Agenda & Packet

Home Browse Search

6 landscape screening. The Petitioners would state that the building is existing .and should not have a negative impact if allowed to remain. The placement of the proposed paved driveway and parking as shown without additional landscaping should not .have a detrimental affect on the former railroad right-of-way or adjacent industrial property to the West. The fourth request is a Variance from the requirement of providing a 10 foot Side Yard Setback along the East property line to a 0 foot Setback (i.e. 0 Lot Linej. This. is similar to the Zero Lot line request for Parcel "C" and allows the existing building to remain with a party wall along the boundary between the two parcels. The last request is for a Variance from the Minimum requirement of 150 feet of frontage along a Public Street for a property zoned "GI" General Industrial District to a minimum of 88 feet more or less along Oakside Street (i.e. North property line). The Petitioners would state that they have attempted to lay out this property as efficiently as possible and to have interior access ways that can be used by all property owners within the development. The odd shape of the site lends itself to the proposed lot configuration and the Petitioners would hope that the Board Members agree the approval from 150 ft. of frontage to 88 ft, for this odd parcel would not adversely affect any adjacent property. The Petitioners believe that approval of the above Special Exception and Variances for the Parcels in this proposed small-integrated Industrial Park, will not be detrimental to adjacent properties. Based on the above information, the Petitioners would ask the Board Members to agree that approval of the above described Special Exception and Variances will not have a detrimental affect for this area, nor would the property values, public's health, safety, morals, or general welfare be adversely affected. The Petitioners contend that the strict application of the terms of the Zoning ordinance. will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship as applied to the property for which the Variances and Special Exception are sought: that the need for the Variances and Special Exception arises from such condition peculiar to the property in the same Zone: and that the use or value of the area adjacent to the property described in the petition for the Variances and Special Exception will not be injurious to the public health, Safety, morals, or general welfare of the community. I attest, under the penalties for perjury, that the foregoing representations are true. riicnael ~, uancn President Danch, Harner & Associates, Inc.