Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br />The third request is for a Variance from the Minimum required 30-foot <br />Building Setback along the North property. line (i.e. Woodside Street and <br />a Public Alley) to a minimum,of 3 foot for an existing building. As <br />shown, the Petitioners desire to use the existing building and leave the <br />structure where it presently sits on the property. This building has <br />been as close to the street as shown for the past decades and approval <br />of a Variance for it to remain, should not adversely affect surrounding <br />properties. <br />The fourth requests is for a Variance from the Minimum required 30- <br />foot Building Setback along the East property line (i.e. Main Street) to <br />a minimum of 0 foot for an existing building. This building has been at <br />the property line for the past few decades and again approval of a <br />Variance for the existing situation should not adversely affect adjacent <br />properties. <br />The last request is for a Variance from the requirement of providing <br />a minimum of 35 parking spaces on-site for 10,000 square foot of <br />proposed office space in the existing building to providing a minimum of <br />35 parking spaces off-site on Parcel "D" as shown. The Petitioners as <br />stated before desire to keep the existing building and would prefer to <br />create a new parking area as shown on proposed Parcel "D" which would <br />service both uses on Parcels "C" and "D". The Petitioners would state <br />they are providing some parking spaces on Parcel "C" but the remaining <br />spaces can be accommodated on Parcel "D" which is conveniently located <br />to the existing building. The Petitioners do not believe approval of <br />this request would be detrimental to any surrounding property. <br />The development of Parcel "D" requires a Variance from the <br />requirement of providing Type "A" Perimeter landscaping along the East, <br />North, West and South property lines to no landscaping. As stated above <br />approval of this Variance should not have a detrimental affect on <br />surrounding properties and the location of the existing building along a <br />portion of the West property- line would make placement of landscaping <br />difficult. The adjacent properties are either zoned Industrial or have <br />been used as a railroad right-of-way. <br />The second request is a Variance to be allowed to place a proposed <br />Parking area in the required 100-foot wide Residential Bufferyard along <br />the East property line to a minimum of 20 foot and screening said <br />Parking with a shown Evergreen Buffer. The Petitioners would state that <br />they believe the intent of this requirement was to maintain a sufficient <br />bufferyard for an Industrial site that may have outside storage of <br />materials. They don't believe a 100 ft. wide bufferyard would be <br />required for a parking area. They. would state that as shown they are <br />providing a 20 ft. wide buffer area containing a double row of evergreen <br />trees which should screen the parking area from any adjacent property. <br />They would state that approval of this Variance should not .have an <br />adverse impact on adjacent properties. <br />The third request is for a Variance to be allowed to have an existing <br />building and a proposed paved driveway and parking in the required 100- <br />foot wide Bufferyard along Unzoned property (i.e. Railroad Right-of- <br />way),along the West property line to a minimum of 1 foot with no <br />