Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Weaver Consultants Group <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />4.3 Structure Foundation Considerations <br />In general, the soil conditions, as previously described, appear to be adequate for the support of <br />manhole or outlet structures. An exception to this is in the vicinity of Boring B-1 where the granular <br />soils beneath a depth of about 5 feet are very loose. For structures in this area, we recommend the <br />very loose soil be removed to a depth of 2 feet below the structure bottom and replace with <br />compacted coarse aggregate meeting the general gradation requirements for Indiana Department <br />of Transportation (INDOT) No. 8 coarse aggregate. Based on these conditions, we recommend that <br />the base be proportioned using a net allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. In our opinion, <br />the subgrade should be compacted to densify the soils loosened by the excavation process to <br />minimize the risk of excessive settlement. Since groundwater is likely to be below the base of the <br />structures, the effects of buoyancy are not likely to be a consideration. <br />4.4 Dry Wells <br />We understand that dry wells are being considered to provide infiltration of the collected runoff into <br />the below grade stratum. Groundwater was generally encountered at a depth of about 5 feet below <br />the ground surface. The soil profile above the groundwater was somewhat mixed with fine to coarse <br />sand and fine to coarse sand with silt. These soils are generally conducive to infiltration of water. <br />Below the water table the soil profile was even more mixed with some locations having sand (SP), <br />silty sand (SM) and clayey sand (SC) underlain by silt (ML). The silty sand, clayey sand, and silt are far <br />less permeable than the sand soils and infiltration will within these zones will be slow and limited. <br />In addition to the infiltration issue, excavation below the groundwater level will require dewatering <br />and shoring to prevent soil collapse of the excavation sidewalls. <br />Two soil particle size distribution tests were performed on representative samples of the sand (SP) <br />type soil. Results of these test were used to estimate the soil infiltration rate. The estimated <br />infiltration rates based on the Hazen Formula are presented in Table 1. <br />Table 1 – Summary of Infiltration Estimates <br />Location Depth <br />(ft.) <br />Infiltration Rate <br />(in./hr.) <br />Correction <br />Factor <br />Design Rate <br />(in./hr.) Soil Classification (USCS) <br />B-1 8½ - 10 100 3 33 SAND with SILT, some <br />gravel (SP-SM) <br />B-4 3½ - 5 44 3 15 SAND with SILT, <br />little gravel (SP-SM) <br />Based on the results of our laboratory analysis, the soils classified as sand can be considered to have <br />a design infiltration in excess of 10 inches/hour or the maximum limit provided by local code. <br />