My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Traffic Control Device -1117 Roosevelt St.
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Board of Works Documents
>
2021
>
Traffic Control Devices
>
Traffic Control Device -1117 Roosevelt St.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2021 4:22:29 PM
Creation date
2/23/2021 4:22:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Requests
Document Date
2/23/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />DEPARTMENT OF LAW <br />1200 COUNTY-CITY BUILDING <br />227 W. JEFFERSON BLVD. <br />SOUTH BEND, INDIANA 46601-1830 <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Board of Public Works <br /> <br />FROM: Aladean DeRose AMD <br /> City Attorney & ADA/Title VI Coordinator <br /> <br />DATE: February 17, 2021 <br />Re: Review of Denial of Residential Parking Permit <br /> <br />An application for a residential disability parking permit was submitted by the owner of 1117 South <br />Roosevelt Street in December 2020. Permission for the permit was denied by the Board at its meeting on <br />January 12, 2021 at the recommendation of the City Engineering Office. Denial was based upon Chapter <br />20, Article 9, Section 20-113.1(3) which limits the number of reserved parking areas to “a total of two spaces <br />on each side of any one City block.” The uneven numbered side of the 1100 block of South Roosevelt <br />Street has two existing permits, one at 1109 and the other at 1133. <br /> <br />At its meeting on January 12, 2021, the Board recommended denial of the application based on the City <br />Engineering Office’s recommendation but subject to final review and recommendation of the City’s <br />ADA/Title VI Coordinator to whom the issue was referred. <br /> <br />As ADA/Title VI Coordinator for the City, and having reviewed the facts, circumstances, and law relevant <br />to this application, I recommend that a permit be granted to this applicant. My opinion is based upon <br />the following factors: <br /> <br />1. The Law. “Title II of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) provides generally that covered <br />entities, [including cities], must ensure that their programs are accessible and usable by persons with <br />disabilities. On street parking is a service offered to everybody; therefore, it must be ensured that there is <br />accessible on street parking.” (Massachusetts Office on Disability, “Accessible On-Street Parking.”) <br />However, neither Title II itself nor the Regulations provided by the Department of Justice contain any rules <br />or guidelines for “accessible” residential street parking; currently it is a subject not covered by statute, <br />regulation, or judicial decision. <br />The ADA regulations for parking lots require that for every 25 parking spaces there must be at least one <br />accessible parking space (which must be van accessible). However, these parking lot regulations apply to <br />commercial, retail, professional, recreational and governmental facilities, not residential, and therefore rely <br />on the statistical likelihood that out of 25 drivers, at least one will be mobility impaired at any given time. In <br />the residential context, the statistical proportionality is not relevant as there may be neighborhoods where a <br />greater number of elderly or otherwise likely mobility impaired persons live. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.