My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/23/12 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
2012
>
10/23/12 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2015 4:19:10 PM
Creation date
11/7/2012 3:42:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
10/23/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AGENDA REVIEW SESSION <br />OCTOBER 18. 2012 337 <br />provision for critical spare parts. Mr. Gilot questioned how long the whole process of upgrading <br />will take. Mr. Klosinski stated construction will take about two (2) years and potentially more. <br />Mr. Gilot stated that brings up the problem with wage rates. He noted they are set at the <br />beginning of the project so how will they be adjusted during the process? Mr. Klosinski stated <br />they can make the contractors aware at the pre -bid and issue an addendum. Toy Villa, <br />Construction Manager, stated they cannot do an addendum; they have to use the wage rates set at <br />bid time because that is what the contractors based their bid amount on. He noted the contractors <br />make adjustments in their pay, but it doesn't change the specifications. Mr. Gilot questioned if <br />they run into issues after the budget is set, do they have a process for adding in additional costs. <br />Mr. Klosinski stated only decreases should occur if they need to eliminate some of the <br />equipment. He stated they originally planned to split the bid into two contracts, but decided that <br />dealing with two different contactors on one project was not good. <br />The Clerk was instructed to post the agenda and notify the media and other persons who have <br />requested notice of the meeting agenda. No other business came before the Board. The meeting <br />adjourned at 12:36 p.m. <br />BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />Gary A. Gilot, President <br />onald E. nks, Member <br />4"'1CPVZ1_ <br />Kathryn E. R s, Member <br />Michael C. Mecham, Member <br />Mark W. Neal, Member <br />�,,ifida M. Martin, Clerk <br />REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 23, 2012 <br />The regular meeting of the Board of Public Works was convened at 9:38 a.m. on Tuesday, <br />October 23, 2012, by Board President Gary A. Gilot, with Board Members Michael Mecham and <br />Mark Neal present. Board Members Donald E. Inks and Kathryn E. Roos were absent. Also <br />present was Attorney Cheryl Greene. <br />ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA <br />Mr. Gilot noted the addition to the agenda of a Request to Reject Bids and Re- Advertise for the <br />Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation project, and two (2) agreements related to environmental clean-up <br />issues, one with Ivy Tower Corporation and one with Union Station Properties. <br />APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING <br />Upon a motion made by Mr. Mecham, seconded by Mr. Neal and carried, the Minutes of the <br />Agenda Review Session of October 4, 2012, the Regular Meeting of October 9, 2012 and the <br />Claims Meeting of the Board held on October 16, 2012, were approved. <br />APPROVE RE- ADVERTISING — CENTURY CENTER LIGHTING RENOVATIONS — <br />PROJECT NO. 112 -057 CENTURY CENTER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT <br />This was the date set for receiving and opening of sealed bids for the above referenced project. <br />The Clerk tendered proofs of publication of Notice in the South Bend Tribune and the Tri- <br />County News, which were found to be sufficient. No bids were received. Mr. Gilot stated he <br />understood from City staff that the bid specifications were unclear and difficult to work around. <br />Therefore, Mr. Gilot made a motion to authorize the City Engineer to work with the Energy <br />Director to reconfigure the bid specifications to clarify the conditions. Mr. Mecham seconded the <br />motion, which carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.