My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2 Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Agendas & Packets
>
2012
>
07-26-12 Packet
>
2 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2013 7:07:24 PM
Creation date
11/1/2012 10:32:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting —July 12, 2012 <br />project design guidelines, background, needs <br />assessment, initial design assessment, <br />corridor selection, roadway selection or <br />section selection, alignment selection, <br />intersection layout, collateral concerns, <br />public involvement and the conclusion. The <br />entire PowerPoint presentation is attached to <br />these minutes. <br />Mr. Varner asked Mr. Durr what he meant <br />when he referenced, repeatedly, a benefit to <br />collateral concerns. Mr. Durr responded that <br />collateral concerns would be such things as <br />pedestrian traffic, adding of sidewalks, multi- <br />use paths, separation of sewers, sanitary <br />storm sewers, addressing existing flooding <br />problems that are occurring on Chippewa and <br />Fellows Sts., several intersection issues <br />where Teri and Chippewa intersect with <br />Fellows, and at the Walter St. intersection. <br />Mr. Varner asked Mr. Durr what he meant by <br />the worse conditions, based on alternative <br />one. Mr. Durr responded that from an <br />engineering perspective, they are: more <br />traffic, less front yard, the need for retaining <br />walls, long -term maintenance, and drainage <br />problems on the east side. <br />Mr. Varner asked Mr. Durr if omitting the <br />sidewalk would make alternative two an <br />acceptable option. Mr. Durr noted to get the <br />grade up on the east up to match, there would <br />still be a grading issue. Mr. Varner clarified <br />that no sidewalk is an option. Mr. Durr <br />responded it is an option but then there is no <br />pathway for anyone on the east side. Mr. <br />Varner noted there is a sidewalk on the west <br />side. Mr. Durr noted there is a gap on the <br />west side, south of Walter Street. He also <br />noted that the east side is intended to be a <br />multi -use path that will connect into the <br />M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.