My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revised City of South Bend Disparity Study Report
sbend
>
Public
>
Inclusive Procurement and Contracting Board (MBE/WBE)
>
Reports
>
Revised City of South Bend Disparity Study Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2020 1:57:54 PM
Creation date
11/3/2020 1:55:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of South Bend Disparity Study 2020 <br />services and real estate industries (19 percent), and non -manufacturing <br />goods production and associated services industry (18 percent). 159 <br />Profitability Performance Index <br />After controlling for other firm characteristics, the SBCS found that <br />fewer minority-owned firms were profitable compared to non minority- <br />owned firms during the prior two years. This gap proved most pro- <br />nounced between White- (57 percent) and Black -owned firms (42 per- <br />cent). On average, however, minority-owned firms and non minority- <br />owned firms were nearly as likely to be growing in terms of number of <br />employees and revenues. <br />Financial and Debt Challenges/Demands <br />The SBCS found that the number one reason for financing was to <br />expand the business or pursue a new opportunity. Eighty-five percent <br />of applicants sought a loan or line of credit. Black -owned firms reported <br />more attempts to access credit than White -owned firms but sought <br />lower amounts of financing. <br />Black-, Hispanic-, and Asian -owned firms applied to large banks for <br />financing more than they applied to any other sources of funds. Having <br />an existing relationship with a lender was deemed more important to <br />White -owned firms when choosing where to apply compared to Black-, <br />Hispanic- and Asian -owned firms. <br />The SBCS also found that small Black -owned firms reported more credit <br />availability challenges or difficulties for expansion than White -owned <br />firms, even among firms with revenues in excess of one million dollars. <br />Black -owned firm application rates for new funding were 10 percentage <br />points higher than White -owned firms; however, their approval rates <br />were 19 percentage points lower. A similar but less pronounced gap <br />existed between Hispanic- and Asian -owned firms compared with <br />White -owned firms. Of those approved for financing, only40 percent of <br />minority-owned firms received the entire amount sought compared to <br />68 percent of non minority-owned firms, even among firms with com- <br />parably good credit scores. <br />Relative to financing approval, the SBCS found stark differences in loan <br />approvals between minority-owned and White -owned firms. When <br />controlling for other firm characteristics, approval rates from 2015 to <br />2016 increased for minority-owned firms and stayed roughly the same <br />159. Forty-two percent of Black-ownedfirms, 21 percent of Asian -owned firms, and 24percent of His panic -owned firms were <br />smaller than $100K In revenue size compared with 17 percent of White -owned firms. <br />0 2020 Colette Holt & Associates, All Rights Reserved. 85 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.