My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revised City of South Bend Disparity Study Report
sbend
>
Public
>
Inclusive Procurement and Contracting Board (MBE/WBE)
>
Reports
>
Revised City of South Bend Disparity Study Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2020 1:57:54 PM
Creation date
11/3/2020 1:55:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of South Bend Disparity Study 2020 <br />To better explain the data in Table 5-3, its first column of data represents a ratio <br />indicating the share of all sales and receipts held by a demographic group divided <br />by that group's share of all firms. For Blacks, this ratio is 7.67 percent. This is <br />derived bytaking numbers presented in Table 5-2. As shown in Table 5-2, the Black <br />share of sales and receipts for all firms is 0.5 percent; the Black share of total num- <br />ber of all firms is 7.0 percent. With 0.5 percent in the numerator and 7.0 percent <br />in the denominator, the ratio is 7.67 .143 If Black -owned firms earned a share of <br />sales equal to their share of total firms, the disparity would have been 100 per- <br />cent. An index less than 100 percent indicates that a given group is being utilized <br />less than would be expected based on its availability. Courts have adopted the <br />Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's "80 percent rule" that a ratio less <br />than 80 percent presents a prima facie case of discrimination.144 All disparity <br />ratios for non-White firms and White women firms are below this threshold .145 <br />Table 5-2: Demographic Distribution of Sales and Payroll Data —Aggregated <br />Groups <br />All Industries, 2012 <br />143. Pleasenote: while the tables present values that are rounded to the two -digit level, the actual values are not. Hence, <br />using the example presented above, 0.5 divided by 7.0 equals 7.14; however, with the unrounded versions of the data, <br />the result is 7.67. <br />144. 29 C.F.R. § 1607.4(D) ("A selection rate for any race, sex, or ethnic group which is less than four-fifths (4/5) (or eighty <br />percent) of the rate for the group with the highest rate will generally be regarded by the Federal enforcement agencies <br />as evidence of adverse impact, while a greater than four-fifths rate will generally not be regarded by Federal enforce- <br />ment agencies as evidence of adverse Impact"). <br />145. Because the data in this tables are presented for descriptive purposes, significance tests on these results are not con- <br />ducted. <br />01010 Colette Holt & Associates, All Rights Reserved. 75 <br />Number of <br />Receipts - <br />Paid <br />with Paid <br />Number of <br />Annual <br />Firms <br />Paid <br />payroll <br />a, <br />(All Firms) <br />All Firms <br />($1,000) <br />Employees <br />(Employer <br />Employees <br />(Employer <br />Firms) <br />Employees <br />($1,000) <br />Firms) <br />($1,000) <br />Panel A: Distribution <br />of Non -White <br />Firms <br />Native <br />American <br />Panel B: Distribution <br />of All Firms <br />143. Pleasenote: while the tables present values that are rounded to the two -digit level, the actual values are not. Hence, <br />using the example presented above, 0.5 divided by 7.0 equals 7.14; however, with the unrounded versions of the data, <br />the result is 7.67. <br />144. 29 C.F.R. § 1607.4(D) ("A selection rate for any race, sex, or ethnic group which is less than four-fifths (4/5) (or eighty <br />percent) of the rate for the group with the highest rate will generally be regarded by the Federal enforcement agencies <br />as evidence of adverse impact, while a greater than four-fifths rate will generally not be regarded by Federal enforce- <br />ment agencies as evidence of adverse Impact"). <br />145. Because the data in this tables are presented for descriptive purposes, significance tests on these results are not con- <br />ducted. <br />01010 Colette Holt & Associates, All Rights Reserved. 75 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.