My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revised City of South Bend Disparity Study Report
sbend
>
Public
>
Inclusive Procurement and Contracting Board (MBE/WBE)
>
Reports
>
Revised City of South Bend Disparity Study Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2020 1:57:54 PM
Creation date
11/3/2020 1:55:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of South Bend Disparity Study 2020 <br />Nor must the City demonstrate that the "ordinances will change discriminatory <br />practices and policies" in the local market area; such a test would be "illogical" <br />because firms could defeat the remedial efforts simply by refusing to cease <br />discriminating. 46 <br />Next, South Bend need not prove that private firms directly engaged in any dis- <br />crimination in which the government passively participates do so intentionally, <br />with the purpose of disadvantaging minorities and women. <br />Denver's only burden was to introduce evidence which raised <br />the inference of discriminatory exclusion in the local <br />construction industry and link its spending to that <br />discrimination.... Denver was under no burden to identify any <br />specific practice or policy that resulted in discrimination. <br />Neither was Denver required to demonstrate that the purpose <br />of any such practice or policy was to disadvantage women or <br />minorities. To impose such a burden on a municipality would be <br />tantamount to requiring proof of discrimination and would <br />eviscerate any reliance the municipality could place on <br />statistical studies and anecdotal evidence. 7 <br />Similarly, statistical evidence by its nature cannot identify the individuals <br />responsible for the discrimination. 8 <br />3. Examine the Results in South Bend's Unremediated Markets <br />The results of contracts solicited without goals are an excellent indicator of <br />whether discrimination continues to impact opportunities in public contract- <br />ing. Evidence of race and gender discrimination in relevant "unremediated"49 <br />markets provides an important indicator of what level of actual M/WBE partic- <br />ipation can be expected in the absence of City mandated affirmative efforts to <br />contract with M/WBEs.50 As the Eleventh Circuit has acknowledged, "the pro- <br />gram at issue may itself be masking discrimination that might otherwise be <br />occurring in the relevant market."51 If M/WBE utilization is below availability <br />in unremediated markets, an inference of discrimination may be supportable. <br />46. Id. at 973 (emphasis In the original). <br />47. Id. at 971. <br />48. Id. at 973. <br />49. "Unremediated market" means "markets that do not have race -or gender -conscious subcontracting goals in place to <br />remedy discrimination." Northern Contracting It, at `36. <br />50. See, e.g., Western States, 407 F.3d at 992 (Congress properly considered evidence of the "significant drop in racial <br />minorities' participation in the construction industry" after state and local governments removed affirmative action pro- <br />visions). <br />51. Engineering Contractors 11, 122 F.3d at 912. <br />0 2020 Colette Holt & Associates, All Rights Reserved. 31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.